← all publishers

brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

Report this profile Claim this profile

• 5.3k skills
• 0 followers
• 1k repo stars
• 3 weeks ago last updated

1. ▌
   Red Submission · brycewang-stanford

   Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) — the current Elsevier Guide's USD 195 fee (USD 100 all-student; waived on second-and-later resubmissions) that gates review, submission via ScienceDirect/Editorial Manager, the ≤250-word abstract, 1-6 keywords, author-year references, single-anonymized format, AI declaration, Option C data statement, and optional SSRN preprint. Final checks; it does not draft content.
   1k repo stars
2. ▌
   Restud Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

   Use when a referee report or R&R has arrived for a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript and a point-by-point response letter plus aligned manuscript revisions are needed. Structures the revision and the letter; does not redo the science from scratch.
   1k repo stars
3. ▌
   Restud Workflow · brycewang-stanford

   Use when deciding which restud-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
   1k repo stars
4. ▌
   Rof Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford

   Use when the marginal contribution of a Review of Finance (RoF) manuscript to the finance literature is fuzzy or undersold — turning a result into a defensible "what we now know that we did not" claim that a top-three-standard referee will accept.
   1k repo stars
5. ▌
   Rfs Robustness · brycewang-stanford

   Use when results may be fragile or when multiple-testing / out-of-sample discipline is the bottleneck for a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript. Builds the robustness battery referees will demand; does NOT design identification or write the rebuttal.
   1k repo stars
6. ▌
   Rfs Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

   Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript — the SFS Editorial Express portal, cover letter, formatting, Internet Appendix, submission fee, and SFS norms. Checks readiness; does NOT write the paper or the rebuttal.
   1k repo stars
7. ▌
   Ssi Workflow · brycewang-stanford

   当需要对一篇投往《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 的稿件做从选题到见刊的全流程编排时调用。串联选题与栏目定位、中文写作、实验与可复现、相关工作、投稿审计、三审三校审稿、修回答复、录用定稿校样等阶段，给出各阶段的顺序、交付物、时间意识与所用技能。作为国家级大信息学科综合旗舰，本刊以重大原创与评述为主、强调科学价值与创新高度；本技能是把 12 个 SSI 技能编织起来的总控，并厘清与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 的择一投稿关系。
   1k repo stars
8. ▌
   Spq Submission · brycewang-stanford

   Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) via SageTrack / ScholarOne Manuscript Central — article type, blinded manuscript plus separate title page, word/abstract caps, keywords, ASA Style Guide formatting, the $25 processing fee and its waivers, and ethics. Final checks; it does not draft content.
   1k repo stars
9. ▌
   Ssc Argumentation · brycewang-stanford

   Use when tightening the logical argument and conceptual rigor of a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — making concept definitions explicit, ensuring each section advances the core proposition, and keeping theoretical / normative reasoning valid (not replaced by data tables). Applies to theoretical, normative, and historical-comparative papers as much as empirical ones.
   1k repo stars
10. ▌
    Socs Concept Building · brycewang-stanford

    Use to extract concepts or mechanisms from empirical materials for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — naming a phenomenon, defining it, bounding it, and moving back and forth between materials and sociological theory. Use especially for qualitative work that risks staying at the level of description.
    1k repo stars
11. ▌
    Webconf Author Response · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window, triaging reviews from the venue's mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool, answering misread-track objections, protecting anonymity, and deciding what can honestly be promised for the camera-ready versus what needs new evidence.
    1k repo stars
12. ▌
    Webconf Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford

    Use when hardening the reproducibility of a Web Conference (WWW) paper whose evidence rests on crawls, platform APIs, live systems, or user logs — covering dataset decay, temporal snapshots, seed and environment reporting, the reproducibility appendix inside the 12-page PDF, and honest claims when the Web itself cannot be replayed.
    1k repo stars
13. ▌
    Webconf Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project belongs at the Web Conference (WWW) at all, which of the ten research tracks should review it, whether the short-paper or Web4Good lane fits better, and when the work should instead route to WSDM, SIGIR, CIKM, KDD, ICWSM, WebSci, or an ML flagship.
    1k repo stars
14. ▌
    Wber Robustness · brycewang-stanford

    Use when results for a The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) manuscript may be sensitive to specification, sample, measurement, or inference choices — and you need a threat-organized robustness plan rather than an appendix dump. Organizes checks by identifying threat and by data-quality risks specific to developing-country data; it does not run the estimation.
    1k repo stars
15. ▌
    Wber Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) via the ScholarOne ManuscriptCentral portal — the 40-page total cap, single-anonymized title page, abstract/JEL, data availability statement with DOI, and house format. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
16. ▌
    Worlddev Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a development question fits World Development (WD) and which sibling journal it really belongs to. Tests scope, relevance, and outlet fit; it does not invent evidence or citations.
    1k repo stars
17. ▌
    Ylj Student Editor Review · brycewang-stanford

    Use when working with The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) student editors during evaluation and acceptance — the Articles & Essays Committee read, the Notes Development process for student authors, and the source-pull. It explains how the student-edited model works; it does not run the intensive line-edit cycle (ylj-revision-and-editing).
    1k repo stars
18. ▌
    Amann Revision · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal decision or full-review referee letter — framework/attitude asks, coverage gaps, balance complaints, and accessibility. Drafts the response letter and revision plan; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or redesign the framework from scratch (amann-organizing-framework).
    1k repo stars
19. ▌
    Amann Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which amann-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
20. ▌
    Amr Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — ScholarOne portal, AOM format and length, abstract, anonymization for review, references, ethics/originality, and required files. Theory-only journal; there is no data-availability or replication step.
    1k repo stars
21. ▌
    Aes Author Response · brycewang-stanford

    在为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 撰写审稿意见答复与修回说明时调用。适用于收到编辑部"修改后再审/退修"通知后，逐条回应外审专家意见、撰写"修改说明"对照表、在正文中标注修改痕迹、处理相互矛盾或要求补做实验的意见、把握修回时限与再审轮次。帮助电子/信息/通信/信号处理方向的中文稿件在《电子学报》多级审理中稳步走向录用，避免因答复不规范或情绪化措辞被再次退修甚至退稿。
    1k repo stars
22. ▌
    Aes Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford

    当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件强化可复现性与实验可重复时使用。覆盖电子/信息/信号处理/通信类工作的实验环境记录、随机性控制、数据与预处理透明、算法伪代码与超参数完整披露、硬件与仿真工具链版本、统计显著性与多次运行、以及在中文学报正文与附录里如何组织可复现信息。帮助作者用可复现性作为通过《电子学报》外审、抵御"结果无法重复"质疑的核心竞争力，而非事后补救。
    1k repo stars
23. ▌
    Aes Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 判断选题是否对口、定位到合适栏目/学科方向时使用。覆盖本刊电子科学与技术、信息与通信工程、信号与信息处理、电路与系统、电磁场与微波、集成电路等学科侧重，如何评估选题的创新性与本刊契合度、区别于计算机类与控制类兄弟刊、判断投中文《电子学报》还是英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics、以及原创论文与综述的定位差异。帮助作者在动笔前就把选题放进《电子学报》的正确坐标，避免因不对口在初审被退。
    1k repo stars
24. ▌
    Advmat Length Management · brycewang-stanford

    Use when an Advanced Materials manuscript must be fit to its article-type format — Communication versus Research Article — where word count and display items are budgeted together against a typeset page limit. Manages the length budget; does not restructure the science or polish prose line by line.
    1k repo stars
25. ▌
    Nature Food · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Nature Food or deciding whether a food-systems manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the food-systems-significance and transdisciplinary bar, evidence and reproducibility expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
26. ▌
    Amanthro Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Anthropologist (AA) via the Research Exchange platform — section selection, anonymization, word/abstract caps, Chicago author-date (free-format accepted), DOIs, ORCID, ethics statement, and figure permissions/alt text. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
27. ▌
    Asr Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Sociological Review (ASR) via Sage Track — masked-manuscript preparation, the separate title page, word/abstract caps, ASA Style Guide formatting, the $25 processing fee, and ethics declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
28. ▌
    Arsoc Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final delivery preflight for a commissioned Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) review via the Annual Reviews production system — disclosure statements, reference/format compliance, figure permissions, and the transparency of the coverage account or any meta-analysis the review contains. Final checks; it does not draft content or handle the response letter (arsoc-revision).
    1k repo stars
29. ▌
    Ceq Identification · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the identification strategy is the bottleneck for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — either a structural model with credible parameters, or a clean quasi-experiment (DID / IV / RDD / event-study). CEQ is the strictest Chinese econ journal here; identification assumptions must be made explicit and each defended. Stress-test the design before drafting exhibits.
    1k repo stars
30. ▌
    Cjc Submission · brycewang-stanford

    在向《计算机学报》(Chinese Journal of Computers, CJC) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 cjc.ict.ac.cn 在线投稿系统、注册与提交同步(相差不超过 1 天)规则、官方 Word/LaTeX 长文模板、中英文摘要与关键词、中图分类号(TP)、GB/T 7714 参考文献中英文对照、学术不端检测(总重复率 30% 红线)、审理费与栏目归属，并在提交前做退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份计算机全学科的中文原创长文打磨到符合本刊三审制门槛的场景。
    1k repo stars
31. ▌
    Cpa Mechanism · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or writing the governance / policy-process mechanism analysis for a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript. Identifies how an effect is produced (implementation, attention allocation, central-local, incentives / accountability) via quantitative mediation or qualitative process evidence. 本技能服务于《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public Administration, CPA)。
    1k repo stars
32. ▌
    Rural Economy · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting 《农村经济》(Rural Economy — 四川省社会科学院主办的农村经济综合月刊, 1983 年创刊, CN51-1029/F, ncjj.alljournal.cn 在线投稿, 摘要≤150字+顺序编码参考文献) or deciding whether a Chinese 三农/农村经济 manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
33. ▌
    Cogpsych Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford

    Use when analyzing data and fitting/comparing models for a Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) manuscript. The journal expects principled model fitting and comparison (AIC/BIC/Bayes factors), parameter and model recovery, (generalized) linear mixed models or hierarchical Bayesian estimation where apt, and effect sizes with uncertainty — all reproducible from shared code. Guides the analysis and modeling; it does not fabricate results.
    1k repo stars
34. ▌
    Cogpsych Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting or polishing a Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) manuscript — a long-form, integrative article that must weave multiple experiments and a formal model into one continuous theoretical argument. Tightens structure, the experiment-to-model narrative, and APA-style reporting; it does not invent content. Verify the journal's current length and format guidance on the official page.
    1k repo stars
35. ▌
    Csj Review Process · brycewang-stanford

    在需要理解《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 审稿流程与各环节作者杠杆时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)，采用单盲审稿制(作者不知审稿人、审稿人知作者)。技能建模编辑初审→专家外审→复审退修→主编终审→修回的流程，说明各环节判据、可能结果(录用/小修/大修/退稿)、时间预期(具体周期待核实)与作者在每一步能做什么。适用于投稿后判断稿件所处阶段、评估修回策略、管理预期的场景。
    1k repo stars
36. ▌
    Conbio Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project fits Conservation Biology and which article type to target. Conservation Biology is the Society for Conservation Biology's flagship journal, so the test is novelty plus transferable, direct relevance to conserving biological diversity, not local description alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
    1k repo stars
37. ▌
    Ectheory Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a result is the right kind of contribution for Econometric Theory (ET) — a general, foundational econometric-theory result (asymptotics, proofs, theorems) rather than an applied estimate, and whether it fits a full Article or a short Miscellanea.
    1k repo stars
38. ▌
    Er Identification · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for an Economic-Research manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML, event study). Stress-tests the design against modern (2019-2024) estimators and reporting standards before drafting tables.
    1k repo stars
39. ▌
    Er Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when finalizing regression tables and figures for an Economic-Research manuscript. Enforces three-line table style, footnote conventions, column-count discipline, and figure aesthetics.
    1k repo stars
40. ▌
    Biomaterials · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Biomaterials or deciding whether a biomaterials manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the dual materials-characterization-plus-biological-evaluation bar, mechanism rigor, house style, the Biomaterials-vs-NBME-vs-functional-materials routing, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
41. ▌
    Critical Inquiry · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Critical Inquiry or deciding whether a theoretical or interdisciplinary critical-humanities manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's high-theory fit, the agenda-setting argument bar, conceptual-stakes and cross-disciplinary expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
42. ▌
    Past And Present · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Past & Present or deciding whether a social, economic, or cultural history manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its problem-driven "big question" argument bar, primary-source and historiographical expectations, Chicago house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
43. ▌
    The Art Bulletin · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting The Art Bulletin or deciding whether an art-history manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as the CAA generalist flagship across all periods and regions, the original-argument and close-visual-analysis bar, primary-source command, Chicago house style, image-rights expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
44. ▌
    Nature Water · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Nature Water (Nat Water) or deciding whether a water-science or water-engineering manuscript fits this high-impact Nature-family venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
45. ▌
    Plos Biology · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting PLOS Biology (PLOS Biol) or deciding whether a general biology manuscript fits this open-access venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, transparency culture, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
46. ▌
    Mis Quarterly · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting MIS Quarterly (MISQ) or deciding whether an information-systems behavioral / design-science / economics-of-IS manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
47. ▌
    Eer Identification · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the empirical causal-identification argument is the bottleneck for a European Economic Review (EER) manuscript — DiD/event-study, IV, RDD, or experiment. Stress-tests the design to EER's general-interest credibility bar before exhibits are finalized; it does not build the theory model or the robustness battery.
    1k repo stars
48. ▌
    Eer Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building or revising exhibits for a European Economic Review (EER) manuscript so they report standard errors, read cleanly, and follow Elsevier economics norms. Designs tables and figures; it does not run the estimation or write the surrounding prose.
    1k repo stars
49. ▌
    Eursr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit. ESR R&Rs typically demand substantial revision and reviewers focus on comparative design, measurement equivalence, and modeling, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
    1k repo stars
50. ▌
    Eursr Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when starting or routing any European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript and unsure which skill applies. Routes to the right ESR sub-skill based on the lifecycle stage and the manuscript type (research Article ~8,000 words vs. Comment/Reply vs. Data Brief). It dispatches; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
51. ▌
    Expecon Theory Model · brycewang-stanford

    Use when turning the behavioral or game-theoretic argument behind an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript into pre-specified, testable predictions. Develops the hypotheses tested; it does not run estimation or invent citations.
    1k repo stars
52. ▌
    Fcr Figures And Tables · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building tables and figures for a Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, quantitatively complete, and agronomically informative — yield and response curves, AMMI/GGE biplots, observed-vs-simulated plots, and weather-vs-phenology series. FCR exhibits must show units, error (SED/LSD), and sample structure. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
    1k repo stars
53. ▌
    Finman Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a topic fits Financial Management (FM) and is worth aiming there — testing the question for general-interest finance relevance, topicality, and managerial/market payoff before the literature and design work begins. Sets the target; it does not run analysis or write the paper.
    1k repo stars
54. ▌
    Hlr Revision And Editing · brycewang-stanford

    Use when working through the Harvard Law Review (HLR) post-acceptance editing cycle — successive substantive and technical edit rounds, responding to editor markups, and page proofs to publication. Drives the edit cycle to completion; it does not manage the offer/expedite phase (hlr-placement-strategy) or the first editor handshake (hlr-student-editor-review).
    1k repo stars
55. ▌
    Hlr Sources And Bluebook · brycewang-stanford

    Use when citing authority in a Harvard Law Review (HLR) piece — pinpoint citations, the authority hierarchy, and The Bluebook (which HLR co-publishes). Governs how sources are cited and weighted; it does not build the footnote apparatus end-to-end (hlr-footnotes-and-cite-check) or write the prose.
    1k repo stars
56. ▌
    Humrel Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford

    Use when sharpening the theoretical contribution and the "so what" for a Human Relations (HR) manuscript once results exist. Frames the contribution; it does not develop the underlying theory or run analysis.
    1k repo stars
57. ▌
    Hrm Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford

    Use when estimation and analysis are the bottleneck for a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") manuscript — fitting HLM/SEM, testing mediation and cross-level moderation, defending aggregation, and qualitative coding rigor. Runs and validates the analysis; it does not design the study (hrm-methods).
    1k repo stars
58. ▌
    Hrm Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the prose, abstract, or introduction are the bottleneck for a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") manuscript — making the HRM/OB argument land and surfacing the practitioner takeaway in the journal's dual-audience voice. Late-stage polish; it does not fix the theory or design (hrm-theory-development, hrm-methods).
    1k repo stars
59. ▌
    Isr Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscript — INFORMS ScholarOne portal, double-anonymization, the 32/38-page cap and formatting, the mandatory ~500-word contribution statement, and the required editor/reviewer nominations in the cover letter. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (isr-rebuttal).
    1k repo stars
60. ▌
    Io Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford

    Use when executing and reporting the empirical analysis (or the formal-model results) for an International Organization (IO) manuscript so it survives expert double-blind IR review and IO's pre-publication verification. The IO editorial staff re-run quantitative analyses and check formal proofs before final acceptance, and IR data raise distinctive estimation problems (dyadic dependence, selection into treaties/alliances/conflict, gravity structure). Guides analysis and reporting; it does not fabricate results.
    1k repo stars
61. ▌
    Io Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting or polishing an International Organization (IO) manuscript so it reads for international-relations scholars across paradigms, fits the word caps (Research Article <= 14,000; Research Note <= 8,000; Essay <= 10,000, including tables, figures, and notes but excluding the bibliography), and meets IO format conventions (double-blind, third-person self-citation, short author-date footnotes, separate abstract/word-count/acknowledgments). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
    1k repo stars
62. ▌
    Interspeech Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging code, models, and audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review, public release at camera-ready, checkpoint and recipe distribution, voice-data licensing and speaker-consent hygiene, and the ethics of releasing synthesis or cloning systems.
    1k repo stars
63. ▌
    Jar Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use after a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) revise-and-resubmit to plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — prioritizing the Senior Editor's first-order concerns (identification, the channel, measurement) and updating the required data-and-code package. Plans and drafts the response; it does not run the new analyses from scratch (jar-data-analysis) or re-run the submission preflight (jar-submission).
    1k repo stars
64. ▌
    Jar Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which jar-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
65. ▌
    Joap Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit. JAP R&Rs typically demand stronger theory, added rigor (alternative models, CMV checks, robustness), and fuller transparency across multiple reviewers and an action editor. The response must address every point, strengthen the contribution, and keep masking intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate results.
    1k repo stars
66. ▌
    Joap Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when starting or navigating any Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing among article types or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and article type (Feature Article, Research Report, theory-development article, integrative review, qualitative, meta-analysis), and flags JAP's twin gates — a real I-O theoretical contribution and measurement/design rigor. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
67. ▌
    Jbf Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to a Journal of Banking & Finance revise-and-resubmit, including triaging referee reports, strengthening identification, adding robustness, preserving anonymity where needed, and drafting a point-by-point response letter.
    1k repo stars
68. ▌
    Jbf Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when routing a Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF) manuscript to the right JBF sub-skill across the lifecycle — topic fit, literature positioning, identification, bank-panel data work, exhibits, Elsevier Editorial Manager submission, double-anonymized review, and R&R rebuttal strategy.
    1k repo stars
69. ▌
    Joc Review Process · brycewang-stanford

    Use to understand how the Journal of Communication (JoC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review, editorial screening for fit, external review by two or three referees, decision categories, and editor discretion. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
    1k repo stars
70. ▌
    Joc Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, APA-formatted, and counted toward the page budget correctly. JoC's 35-page limit includes tables and figures, so exhibits must earn their space. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
    1k repo stars
71. ▌
    Jcp Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting the response letter and revision for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) R&R — turning reviewer process concerns into new studies, writing the point-by-point response, and showing the mechanism is now nailed. Drafts the rebuttal; for reading the letter and feasibility see jcp-review-process.
    1k repo stars
72. ▌
    Jcp Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which jcp-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
73. ▌
    Jcr Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) manuscript — ScholarOne portal, anonymization for double-anonymized review, the 60-page cap, the 200-word abstract, the 300-word Consumer Relevance and Contribution Statement, the Step-6 Data Collection Statement, Chicago/Word formatting, and the transparency apparatus. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (jcr-rebuttal).
    1k repo stars
74. ▌
    Jcf Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) via Editorial Manager — the US$340 non-refundable fee, single-anonymized (non-anonymized) manuscript, ≤250-word abstract, author-date "your paper, your way" references, Option C data statement, declarations, and the optional free SSRN preprint. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
75. ▌
    Joe Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project is a genuine methodological contribution for the Journal of Econometrics (JoE) versus a purely applied result better placed elsewhere. Pressure-tests the idea against JoE's theory-plus-applied-methods scope before months are spent.
    1k repo stars
76. ▌
    Jel Revision · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to editor and referee feedback on a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — coverage gaps, balance complaints, framework/structure asks, and accessibility. Drafts the response letter and revision plan; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (jel-organizing-framework).
    1k repo stars
77. ▌
    Jel Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which jel-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a survey/review article from topic selection through revision for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
78. ▌
    Jfe Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting the response to a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter, point-by-point replies, and the revision-tracking that JFE's demanding rounds require. Drafts the response after revisions are made; it does not invent new results you have not run.
    1k repo stars
79. ▌
    Jfe Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which jfe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
80. ▌
    Jfm Robustness · brycewang-stanford

    Use when results may be sensitive to liquidity-measure choice, sample filters, microstructure noise, or inference for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript. Builds the design-based robustness ledger; it does not invent evidence or citations.
    1k repo stars
81. ▌
    Jfm Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript via Elsevier Editorial Manager — file set, blinding, declarations, data statement, and house formatting. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
82. ▌
    Jfr Mechanism · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the mechanism section of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript stops at "promotes / inhibits" — to pin the effect to a concrete financial channel (credit / risk-taking / balance-sheet / information) with channel-specific evidence rather than a generic mediation regression.
    1k repo stars
83. ▌
    Jle Robustness · brycewang-stanford

    Use when a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) manuscript's headline estimate must be shown to survive specification, sample, jurisdiction, and inference choices before submission or in an R&R. Builds the robustness suite a law-and-economics referee expects; it does not establish the primary identification (jle-identification) or format the exhibits (jle-tables-figures).
    1k repo stars
84. ▌
    Jle Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) manuscript via the Editorial Manager portal — the single-blind title page, the US$100 submission fee, Chicago author-date style, the replication-policy readiness, and disclosures. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
85. ▌
    Jmgmt Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when scoping the question and choosing the article type for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — empirical vs. meta-analysis vs. systematic review, and which management subfield it speaks to. Locks fit; it does not build the theory (jmgmt-theory-development) or design the study (jmgmt-methods).
    1k repo stars
86. ▌
    Jmf Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing the response to a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) revise-and-resubmit. JMF reviews are double-blind and most published papers go through at least one R&R, so the response must convert each anonymous reviewer while keeping the editor confident the revision converges. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
    1k repo stars
87. ▌
    Jmf Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use as the entry point for any Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript. Routes to the right JMF sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether the work fits a full article or a brief report. JMF is the interdisciplinary flagship of family science; the router's first job is to confirm a genuine family-science contribution. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
88. ▌
    Jpe Robustness · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the main result of a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript rests on a single specification and you need to pre-empt the alternative-explanation and fragility objections a Chicago referee will raise. Builds the robustness battery and the falsification logic; it does not establish the primary identification (see jpe-identification).
    1k repo stars
89. ▌
    Jpe Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript via Editorial Express — manuscript format, Chicago author-date references, the $250/$125 submission fee, single-blind review, exhibits, the Micro/Macro companion-journal choice, and supplementary files. Final mechanical gate; it does not improve the economic argument.
    1k repo stars
90. ▌
    Jos Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    当你要判断《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 对代码与数据可用性（artifact）的现状与要求、并据此准备可评估材料时使用。覆盖本刊尚无强制 artifact 评审轨道的现实、如何把可复现材料做成加分项、专刊（special issue）与 CCF ChinaSoft 联动可能带来的材料要求、归档与许可选择、以及与国际会议 artifact badging 的差异，帮助你在《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 语境下做出恰当而不过度的 artifact 准备。
    1k repo stars
91. ▌
    Jue Theory Model · brycewang-stanford

    Use when a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript needs a spatial model to interpret its mechanism — a spatial-equilibrium frame, a sorting model, or a quantitative spatial model (QSM) for counterfactuals. Builds the theory that disciplines the empirics; it does not establish the identification (jue-identification) or run robustness (jue-robustness).
    1k repo stars
92. ▌
    Jwe Identification · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the identification strategy is the bottleneck for a 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy) manuscript — external shocks (tariffs, trade agreements, exchange-rate reforms, FDI negative-list) as quasi-experiments, plus shift-share / Bartik and gravity designs. Stress-tests exogeneity and inference, including the modern shift-share critiques.
    1k repo stars
93. ▌
    Jwe Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when finalizing the main tables and figures of a 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy) manuscript — trimming over-wide regression tables, standardizing notes / clustering / significance, and presenting open-economy-specific objects (event-study plots, gravity tables, GVC decompositions). Use after results are settled.
    1k repo stars
94. ▌
    Jonc Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    当《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 稿件通过三审制录用后、进入定稿与出版阶段时调用；用于把 Journal on Communications 录用稿稳妥推进到正式见刊。指导完成录用后的清样/校样核对、按官方模板终排、缴纳版面费（约 600 元/面，以通知为准）、签署版权/授权、核对作者信息与基金项目、确认中英文摘要与图表在终排中的正确性、处理 DOI 与见刊排期等收尾工作，兼顾本刊月刊出版节奏（每月 25 日出版）与档期排队，帮助把一份通信/网络/信息安全/信号处理方向的中文长文从"录用"稳妥推进到"正式见刊"，避免在定稿环节因校对疏漏或缴费延迟影响出版。
    1k repo stars
95. ▌
    Jonc Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    在为《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 稿件撰写相关工作与文献综述、确立创新性时调用。指导以 delta（相对最强基线的增量）为主线组织通信领域文献，覆盖信道编码/无线传输/网络协议/信息安全/信号处理等子方向的分类归纳，区分本刊与《电子学报》《计算机学报》等兄弟刊读者的关注点，规范 GB/T 7714 引用与中英文文献并重，避免罗列式综述与漏引近三年关键工作，帮助把相关工作写成能支撑本文创新性论证、经得起本刊外审对新颖性质疑的一节，适用于研究长文与规范综述两种体例。
    1k repo stars
96. ▌
    Lang Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Language (LSA) via the Cambridge University Press ScholarOne portal — double-anonymous anonymization, the section and word-limit rules (General Research Article ≤18,000 words; Review Article ≤5,000), the abstract, Leipzig glossing, IPA, the Language Style Sheet, figure alt text, and open-access status. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
97. ▌
    Mgsci Theory Development · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building the theoretical core of a Management Science (INFORMS) paper — either a formal analytical model (assumptions, equilibrium, propositions/theorems, comparative statics) or empirically testable hypotheses derived from a clear mechanism. Adapts to the paper's lane; it does not run the analysis (mgsci-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (mgsci-contribution-framing).
    1k repo stars
98. ▌
    Mksc Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford

    Use when stating the headline contribution of a Marketing Science manuscript — naming the primary dimension (substantive marketing insight, modeling, methodology, data, or practice) and writing the contribution and managerial-implication paragraphs. Frames the contribution; it does not build the model (mksc-theory-development) or run the analysis (mksc-data-analysis).
    1k repo stars
99. ▌
    Mathfin Review Process · brycewang-stanford

    Use when navigating the Mathematical Finance (Wiley) review process — single-blind editor screening, associate-editor handling, and referees who verify proofs line by line. Explains what reviewers at this theory venue check first, common desk-screen failure patterns for theorem-first papers, and how to read review-stage signals.
    1k repo stars
100. ▌
     Mathfin Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

     Use when preparing figures, numerical tables, theorem maps, appendix exhibits, and algorithm displays for a Mathematical Finance manuscript, ensuring every exhibit supports a rigorous result rather than acting as stand-alone empirical evidence.
     1k repo stars