Results for “contest”

Fixa o valor da causa civel conforme os criterios do CPC (arts. 291-293) e trata a impugnacao ao valor da causa. Cobre os criterios por tipo de pedido (cobranca, ato juridico, alimentos, divisao, indenizacao com pedido liquido), a soma de pedidos cumulados, e a impugnacao na contestacao. Use quando o operador disser valor da causa, quanto colocar de valor, impugnar valor da causa, custas, ou ao redigir a inicial/contestacao.

Monta e analisa as preliminares de contestacao do art. 337 do CPC (as 13 hipoteses, I a XIII) e as prejudiciais. Cobre inexistencia/nulidade de citacao, incompetencia, incorrecao do valor da causa, inepcia da inicial, perempcao, litispendencia, coisa julgada, conexao, incapacidade/defeito de representacao, convencao de arbitragem, ausencia de legitimidade ou interesse, falta de caucao, indevida concessao de gratuidade. Use quando o operador for contestar, disser preliminares, art 337, inepcia, ilegitimidade, coisa julgada, litispendencia, ou avaliar defesa processual.

Define o estilo juridico das pecas civeis do plugin — peticoes iniciais, contestacoes, replicas, recursos, manifestacoes, razoes. Use sempre que outra skill for redigir um texto civel, para garantir tom, estrutura, enderecamento e terminologia processual corretos. Acionada internamente pelas skills de redacao.

Rank an existing set of context chunks by relevance, diversity, freshness, and utility. Use when retrieval has already produced candidates that must be scored or reranked; use context-retrieval when the source corpus still needs to be searched.

Analisa os efeitos da revelia (CPC 344-346) e suas excecoes (345), tanto quando o cliente e o revel quanto quando a parte contraria e revel. Cobre a presuncao de veracidade dos fatos (344), as quatro hipoteses em que ela NAO opera (345 — litisconsorte contestante, direito indisponivel, falta de instrumento que a lei repute indispensavel, fatos inverossimeis/contraditorios com a prova), a fluencia de prazos sem intimacao (346) e a possibilidade de o revel ingressar e produzir prova. Use quando o operador disser revelia, reu revel, parte nao contestou, efeitos da revelia, presuncao de veracidade, ou meu cliente perdeu o prazo de defesa.

Review and fix Swift Concurrency issues in Swift 6.2+ codebases by applying actor isolation, Sendable safety, and modern concurrency patterns with minimal behavior changes.

Nocaps: Novel Object Captioning at Scale

Prüft Frist, Form, Zuständigkeit, Rechtsweg und Sofortmaßnahmen im Wettbewerbs- und Beihilfenrecht des Energiesektors; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.

Analyzes federal contract competitors, incumbents, and obligation trends using live USAspending.gov data via the usaspending MCP, supporting black-hat competitor research and contract-number-first obligation analysis.

End-to-end Kaggle competition workflow for scored submissions, covering code competitions, validation, metrics, public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling, multi-notebook architectures, Kaggle GPU offload, and hidden-test debugging.

Build a USASpending relationship snapshot for the incumbent and buying agency on a pursuit row. Use when user needs award flows and rel counts before battlecard or teaming work — deterministic from DuckDB bulk.

Use to design or audit a QA dispute and appeal workflow with timeboxes, adjudication standards, and second-level consistency so appeals improve trust instead of rewriting scores without rules. Trigger for "QA appeal process", "agents disputing scores", "who adjudicates QA disputes", "overturn rate too high", second-level review standards, or calibration erosion from ad-hoc score changes.

Use to audit how payment disputes, chargebacks and unrecognised-transaction claims are handled against scheme deadlines and evidence standards. Trigger for "audit our dispute handling", "chargeback quality review", "are we meeting scheme deadlines", unrecognised transaction claims, provisional credit decisions, or a customer complaining their dispute was rejected unfairly.

Cross-model benchmark for gstack skills. (gstack)

Multi-source recency research skill that takes the pulse of any topic across Reddit, Hacker News, the open web, and optionally X/Twitter within a configurable recent window (default 30 days). Forcing intake clarifies topic specificity, angle (trend/sentiment/problems/opportunities/comparison), time window, and platform scope before searching. Returns a synthesized briefing with citations, engagement metrics, and cross-platform pattern analysis. Use when the user requests multi-source recency intelligence on a topic (e.g., 'pulse on [topic]', 'what's happening with [topic]', 'what are people saying about [topic]', 'current conversation about [topic]', 'take the pulse of [topic]', 'trending: [topic]', 'find me info on [topic]'), and for competitor research, trend discovery, tool comparisons, and audience sentiment analysis.

Produce displace/team/ghost talk tracks for the incumbent on a recompete pursuit. Use when user wants competitive angles saved to the pursuit vault; optional multi-turn LLM for customer-facing phrasing.

Update or correct an existing skill file based on judge feedback or improved understanding.

Retrieve relevant information from a knowledge base using semantic, keyword, or hybrid search to ground a query. Use when the task starts with a corpus or index that must be searched; use context-ranking when candidate chunks already exist and only need ordering.

Adversarial red-team of a running web, React Native, or Capacitor hybrid app. Use when asked to "red team this app", "attack my app", "break it", "find all the defects", "adversarial test", "pre-launch hardening", "pentest the app", or "full app QA". Naive monkey / guest vs logged-in wander → test-exploratory.

Execute the full AgentHub competition lifecycle in a single command: initialize, capture baseline, spawn agents, evaluate results, and merge the winner.

Search Xiaohongshu (RedNote) by keyword and extract paginated note results with title, author, engagement stats, cover image, and xsecToken for detail lookup.

Federal Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) sweeper backed by FAR Subpart 9.5 (9.501-9.508) and the active Theseus workspace knowledge graph. USE WHEN the user asks about OCI risk on a bid, organizational conflicts, incumbent conflicts, biased ground rules, unequal access to information, impaired objectivity, or any pre-bid OCI due diligence. Pulls `company`, `incumbent`, `subcontractor`, `customer`, `program_office`, and prior-contract relationships from the workspace KG, classifies each potential conflict into one of the three FAR 9.505 classes (biased ground rules, unequal access, impaired objectivity), and emits a structured findings envelope with mitigation recommendations (firewall, NDA, recusal, novation). DO NOT USE FOR FAR clause coverage audit (use `compliance-auditor`), proposal prose (use `proposal-generator`), competitor research (use `competitive-intel`), or pricing (use `price-to-win`).

Use to extract competitor mentions, switching language and feature-gap evidence from support conversations as an input to win/loss and product strategy. Trigger for "what competitors do customers mention", "why do customers switch away", "find feature gaps customers ask about", competitive intelligence from support, or win/loss analysis that only samples deals sales remembers.

Play Yoink, an onchain capture-the-flag game on Base. Yoink the flag from the current holder, check game stats and leaderboards, view player scores, and compete for the trophy. Uses Bankr for transaction execution.

Price-to-win lens using GSA CALC+, BLS OEWS, and incumbent USASpending award patterns for a pursuit. Use when user asks for realism checks or competitive pricing posture before proposal — draft skill, not production-verified.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: primary-Skill-selected for races, locks, optimistic conflicts, or worker overlap; never task owner; skip without concurrency impact.

Police the project's vocabulary — bust vague terms, keep the CONTEXT.md glossary sharp, and lock in decisions worth remembering as ADRs. Use when the user debates naming, says "what should we call this", asks to pin down terminology, wants a decision recorded, or when another skill (hot-seat, whiteboard) surfaces a decision that clears the ADR bar. Just reading the glossary for vocabulary is NOT this skill — trigger only when the words or decisions are being changed.

Conduz investigação de incidentes com método: triagem, hipóteses, mitigação, RCA e postmortem, priorizando evidências e confirmação humana.

Answers questions using a structured wiki knowledge base, returning cited synthesis with wikilinks, counter-arguments, and knowledge gaps.

Design motivation systems for products and teams using Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose (AMP) to drive intrinsic engagement.