Results for “klauselpruefung”

Prüft Leasing-AGB auf typische Risiken, trennt Einbeziehung, Transparenz und Inhaltskontrolle, und liefert Klauselampel, Redline und Ersatzformulierungen mit gerichtsfester Begründung.

Ordnet Sachverhalt, Norm, Beweislast, Gegenargumente und nächsten Schritt für die Indexierung von AGB-Klauseln; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "run example" or "test example skill".

Prüft AGB-Klauseln im Bauvertrag nach VOB/B und BGB, ordnet Sachverhalt, Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargumente und liefert eine Schnittstellenkarte mit Kollisions-, Zuständigkeits- und Nachweisfragen.

Systematic plan stress-testing through relentless one-question-at-a-time decision-tree interviewing

Prüft SaaS-AGB-Klauseln nach BGB §§ 305-310, trennt Einbeziehung, Transparenz und Inhaltskontrolle und liefert Klauselampel, Redline und Ersatzformulierungen mit gerichtsfester Begründung.

Prüft Reseller-AGB auf rechtliche Risiken, strukturiert nach Normen, Beweislast und Gegenargumenten, und liefert eine Schnittstellenkarte mit Kollisions-, Zuständigkeits- und Nachweisfragen.

Enforce CLAUDE.md framework compliance. Re-reads rules, displays applicable rules, processes request with full compliance.

Turbine — small Kotlin testing library for kotlinx.coroutines Flows. Provides ergonomic API to test Flow emissions deterministically: awaitItem, expectMostRecentItem, awaitComplete, awaitError. Works with StateFlow, SharedFlow, Channel-backed flows, combine/map/debounce. KMP-friendly. USE WHEN: user mentions "Turbine", "app.cash.turbine", ".test {}", "awaitItem", "Flow testing", "StateFlow test", "SharedFlow test", "expectMostRecentItem", "cancelAndIgnoreRemainingEvents" DO NOT USE FOR: Mobile E2E - use `testing/maestro` DO NOT USE FOR: Compose snapshot - use `testing/compose-snapshot` DO NOT USE FOR: Generic Kotlin testing - use `testing/kotest` DO NOT USE FOR: Suspend function (non-Flow) testing - use `kotlinx-coroutines-test` directly

Busca de precedente civel para fundamentar peca, recurso ou parecer: primeiro no corpus mapeado em context/jurisprudencia-civel.md (organizado por tema com selo de verificacao), e so se faltar busca ao vivo (WebSearch/WebFetch nativo; Firecrawl/Perplexity fallback) exigindo link de fonte real (STJ/STF/CJF/tribunal). Zero acordao inventado. Use quando precisar de sumula, tema repetitivo, enunciado de Jornada, acordao ou tese civel, ou quando o operador disser tem jurisprudencia sobre X, qual a sumula/tema sobre Y, precedente para a tese, acha um acordao do STJ sobre, fundamenta com jurisprudencia.

Deliberative consultation with Codex CLI. Ask, evaluate, critique, iterate until workable agreement.

Universal transformation λ(ο,K).τ with recursive self-improvement. USE WHEN routing reasoning, validating knowledge graphs, preparing CICM/ANZCA examinations, or when self-improvement of reasoning/architecture/context is required. Routes queries through R0-R3 complexity pipelines, validates topology (η≥target) and governance (KROG), emits per style (Φ), and compounds learnings into knowledge K. Triggers on complexity assessment, multi-step reasoning, examination mode, or /λ invocation.

Prevents SOQL injection and enforces CRUD, FLS, and sharing in Apex queries, with guidance for building, reviewing, and troubleshooting secure data access.

Analisa os efeitos da revelia (CPC 344-346) e suas excecoes (345), tanto quando o cliente e o revel quanto quando a parte contraria e revel. Cobre a presuncao de veracidade dos fatos (344), as quatro hipoteses em que ela NAO opera (345 — litisconsorte contestante, direito indisponivel, falta de instrumento que a lei repute indispensavel, fatos inverossimeis/contraditorios com a prova), a fluencia de prazos sem intimacao (346) e a possibilidade de o revel ingressar e produzir prova. Use quando o operador disser revelia, reu revel, parte nao contestou, efeitos da revelia, presuncao de veracidade, ou meu cliente perdeu o prazo de defesa.

Validate Claude Code skills against the agentskills specification. Catches structural, semantic, and naming issues before users do.

Clarifies ambiguous or conflicting requests by researching first, then asking only judgment calls. Use when prompts say "grill me", ask hard questions, request relentless interrogation, pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope/requirements, define success criteria, or request system-design/optimization decisions.

Monta e analisa as preliminares de contestacao do art. 337 do CPC (as 13 hipoteses, I a XIII) e as prejudiciais. Cobre inexistencia/nulidade de citacao, incompetencia, incorrecao do valor da causa, inepcia da inicial, perempcao, litispendencia, coisa julgada, conexao, incapacidade/defeito de representacao, convencao de arbitragem, ausencia de legitimidade ou interesse, falta de caucao, indevida concessao de gratuidade. Use quando o operador for contestar, disser preliminares, art 337, inepcia, ilegitimidade, coisa julgada, litispendencia, ou avaliar defesa processual.

Runs a relentless interview that sharpens a plan or design. Use when the user wants to be grilled on an idea, pressure-test a plan, or refine a design through questioning.

Independent DeepSeek-backed adversarial proof-audit step for existing theorem, lemma, proposition, or proof artifacts in Markdown, LaTeX, or proof logs. Use when asked to check, audit, verify, red-team, or adversarially review a proof; when a completed proof task needs a correctness pass; or when a broader proof workflow dispatches an independent reviewer to find gaps, hidden assumptions, counterexamples, or unjustified steps.

Prevent Kubernetes hallucinations by diagnosing and fixing failure modes: insecure workload defaults, resource starvation, network exposure, privilege sprawl, fragile rollouts, and API drift. Use when generating, reviewing, refactoring, or migrating manifests, Helm charts, Kustomize overlays, cluster policies, and platform-specific Kubernetes work for EKS, GKE, AKS, OpenShift, GitOps controllers, or observability stacks.

Instaura/atua em IRDR — Incidente de Resolucao de Demandas Repetitivas (CPC 976, requisitos simultaneos: I efetiva repeticao sobre questao unicamente de direito + II risco a isonomia/seguranca; legitimados 977; admissibilidade 981; suspensao no Estado/regiao 982 I; tese aplicada a todos e aos casos futuros 985; revisao 986; REsp/RE 987) ou IAC — Incidente de Assuncao de Competencia (CPC 947, questao relevante de grande repercussao social SEM repeticao; acordao vinculante §3), com efeito vinculante da tese (CPC 927 III). Use quando o operador disser IRDR, incidente de resolucao de demandas repetitivas, IAC, assuncao de competencia, tese vinculante regional, muitos processos iguais, suspensao por IRDR.

Prüft Unterlagen und Lücken in Mietrechtsfällen: erstellt Sollkatalog, gleicht Ist-Bestand ab, priorisiert fehlende Dokumente nach Frist- und Beweisrelevanz und entwirft Rückfrageschreiben.

Drafts a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court under Rules 10, 13, 14, and 33. Enforces Rule 10 criteria (circuit splits, precedent conflicts, important federal questions), jurisdictional verification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1254/1257, timeliness, document structure, and booklet formatting. Use when seeking discretionary Supreme Court review, filing a cert petition, or drafting a writ of certiorari.

E2E testing for Clerk apps. Use with Playwright or Cypress for auth flow tests.

Redige a replica do autor e cobre as providencias preliminares (CPC 350-353): manifestacao sobre as preliminares e os documentos juntados com a contestacao, e impugnacao dos fatos impeditivos/modificativos/extintivos alegados pelo reu (350 — prazo 15 dias). Trata tambem a hipotese das materias do 337 (351). Use quando o operador disser replica, manifestacao sobre contestacao, impugnar a contestacao, providencias preliminares, o reu juntou documentos, ou houver prazo para o autor falar apos a defesa.

Use to audit QA coverage and scorecard health in a Rulebase workspace via the Rulebase MCP server. Trigger for "audit our QA coverage", "which agents or channels aren't being evaluated", "are our QA scores meaningful", "is our scorecard working", QA blind spots, score distribution or ceiling effects, and checking whether QA scores relate to SLA or complaint outcomes.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "validate plugin structure", "review manifest files", "check frontmatter compliance", "verify tool invocation patterns", "explain plugin component types", or needs Claude Code plugin architectural guidance.

Deliberative consultation with Codex CLI. Ask, evaluate, critique, iterate until workable agreement.

Audit agent skills, plugins, prompts, manifests, scripts, dependencies, and bundled assets for provenance, prompt-injection, permission, execution, exfiltration, persistence, and update risk. Use when evaluating a third-party skill before installing, enabling, updating, publishing, or distributing it; reviewing an untrusted SKILL.md, agent configuration, MCP integration, archive, or repository; comparing a package with a known-good version; or investigating unexpected tool, network, credential, or filesystem behavior.

Verify feature, bug, UI, API, mobile, security, or deployment work against acceptance criteria.

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

Prüft KG- und Personengesellschaften-Fälle in Großkanzlei Corporate/M&A-Mandaten: Frist, Form, Zuständigkeit, Rechtsweg und Sofortmaßnahmen; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.