brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
3 weeks ago last updated

▌
Eursr Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand how the European Sociological Review (ESR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind peer review, what comparative quantitative reviewers weigh, decision categories, and the ethics rules (anonymity, no simultaneous submission). Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Eursr Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript. ESR excludes tables and figures from the ~8,000-word count but expects them to be clear, self-contained, and to carry magnitude and uncertainty for a comparative quantitative readership. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Cte Literature Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical fiscal / financial / trade theory references are missing. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。

1k repo stars
▌
Ijoc Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a project is computing-first enough for an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) submission and which of its 10 technical areas fits. Scopes the contribution to the OR↔computing interface; it does not invent results or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Ier Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a question is broad and rigorous enough for an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript, and which branch (theory / structural-macro / econometric method / applied micro) frames it. Tests fit and scope; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jar Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when setting expectations for how Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) review and decisions work, or when reading a JAR decision letter — the Senior-Editor-panel structure, double-anonymized review, the desk-screen and tiered-fee gate, and the distinctive Ray Ball Conference and Registered Reports tracks. Explains the process; it does not draft the R&R response (jar-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Jar Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when finalizing the descriptive, results, and identification exhibits for a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript — the summary-statistics table, correlation matrix, main regression tables, and identification plots that an empirical-archival accounting paper lives or dies on. Builds the exhibits; it does not run the estimation (jar-data-analysis) or polish prose (jar-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Joap Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand how the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) evaluates a manuscript — masked (anonymized) peer review, the action-editor model, the dual gate of theoretical contribution and measurement/design rigor, and common desk-reject patterns. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Joap Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript in APA 7th-edition style — correlation/descriptives tables, CFA/SEM path diagrams, multilevel (HLM) result tables, and meta-analytic forest/funnel plots. Exhibits must carry effect sizes, CIs, and reliabilities and be self-contained. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbf Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand the Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF) editorial pipeline — the desk screen, double-anonymized refereeing, the role of the USD 350 fee in reviewer rewards, and what to expect between submission and decision. Sets expectations; pair with jbf-rebuttal once you receive an R&R.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbf Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF) tables and figures — descriptive statistics, regression tables, event-study plots, mechanism and heterogeneity exhibits, appendix robustness inventories, and self-contained notes that report sample, fixed effects, clustering, and units.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbv Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when shaping or stress-testing a research question for the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) — confirming the entrepreneurial phenomenon is central, picking a multidisciplinary lens, and checking fit before investing in theory or data. Defines the question; it does not build the mechanism (jbv-theory-development) or frame the contribution (jbv-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Jcp Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer model, what "process is thin" really means, R&R norms, and the new-studies expectation. Sets expectations and revision strategy; the response letter itself is jcp-rebuttal.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcp Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the exhibits for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — condition-means tables, mediation/moderation path figures, interaction plots, and APA-formatted statistical reporting that makes the process visible. Builds the exhibits; it does not run the analysis (jcp-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jegeo Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose, intro, or abstract of a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript must reach economists and geographers at once. Tunes voice, structure, and the 100-word abstract; it does not invent results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jel Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building exhibits for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — summary "who-found-what" tables, conceptual/framework figures, and meta-evidence exhibits that synthesize across studies. Designs survey exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (a JEL survey reports no new estimates of its own).

1k repo stars
▌
Jfe Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the causal identification or inference design is the bottleneck for a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript — natural experiments, IV, staggered DID, RDD, and explicit endogeneity/selection treatment. Stress-tests the design before drafting tables; it does not finalize factor construction or estimators (see jfe-empirical-design).

1k repo stars
▌
Jfe Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when the exhibits of a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript need to meet house standards — readable tables, self-contained notes, and figures that carry the argument. Handles exhibit craft; it does not decide which robustness tests to run (jfe-robustness).

1k repo stars
▌
Jfm Empirical Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when the market-data design and microstructure measurement are the bottleneck for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — TAQ/order-book cleaning, liquidity and price-impact construction, sample filters. Hardens measurement; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfm Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating the microstructure referee's objections for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — a pre-submission pre-mortem and, post-decision, a triage of the report. Anticipates and triages; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfr Fit Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use to judge whether a manuscript fits 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) and to settle the line — macro-finance vs micro corporate-finance — re-routing to industrial-economics or accounting journals when the paper is not really a finance-mechanism paper.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfr Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use to sharpen the research question and contribution for a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript — turning a finance data finding into a question with a clear financial-mechanism contribution and concrete relevance to China's financial system.

1k repo stars
▌
Jie Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of International Economics (JIE) via Elsevier's Editorial Manager — the non-refundable submission fee, the regular/short/PRP Article Type choice, the 150-word abstract, 1-7 keywords, suggesting a fitting (Co-)Editor, and reference completeness. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jim Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final preflight for a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) submission — the ScholarOne portal, the two-file anonymized package, formatting caps, and declarations. It clears the runway; post-decision strategy belongs to jim-rebuttal.

1k repo stars
▌
Jle Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating the objections a law-and-economics referee at The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense around JLE's single-blind process; it does not draft the response letter (jle-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (jle-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Jms Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or stress-testing whether a research question fits the Journal of Management Studies (JMS) — a phenomenon-grounded management-theory question, quantitative or qualitative. Decides fit and framing direction; it does not build the theory (jms-theory-development) or position the literature (jms-literature-positioning).

1k repo stars
▌
Mw Policy Implication · brycewang-stanford
用于撰写或强化《管理世界》稿件的政策启示章节，把实证与异质性证据翻译成分层、可执行、与国家战略对接的政策建议。Use when 文末政策建议只剩"建议政府重视"、审稿人指出"政策含义太空"、建议过于宏大或与本文实证脱节、或投稿前结论段政策落点不足时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、服务国家重大战略与决策的强政策导向，落实时间×层级分层、点名具体部门、给出可执行动作、并逐条与本文实证证据挂钩，是"理论贡献+中国实践+政策含义"三位一体中不可省略的一极。本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。

1k repo stars
▌
Jmr Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when testing whether a marketing question is a fit for the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) — a methods-/modeling-forward AMA flagship — rather than the managerial Journal of Marketing, the analytical Marketing Science, or the consumer-theory JCR. Locks a question that can clear both JMR's rigor bar and its substantive-contribution bar.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmf Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how the Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous peer review, editor and reviewer roles (typically three reviewers, ~21-day review window), the revise-and-resubmit pathway, and what triggers desk handling. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmf Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, in modified APA style, and count toward the ~35-page (or ~25-page brief-report) limit. JMF counts tables and figures toward the page budget, so exhibits must earn their space. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Jme Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when assessing whether a research question fits the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) — monetary theory and policy, central banking, business cycles, growth, financial intermediation, fiscal interactions, and expectations — before investing in a model or estimation. Checks scope fit and the policy/conceptual payoff bar.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmcb Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) decision letter or referee report has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy and revision plan. Turns the reports into a prioritized, point-by-point rebuttal; it does not re-run the core analysis or re-write the paper.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmcb Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jmcb-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jpe Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when running a pre-submission pre-mortem on a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript to anticipate the price-theory, general-equilibrium, and identification objections a Chicago referee will raise. Builds the threat list and pre-empts it; it does not write the R&R response (see jpe-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Jpube Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when assessing whether a research question fits the Journal of Public Economics (JPubE) — the economic role of government (taxation, public expenditure, social insurance, redistribution, externalities, public goods, fiscal policy) — and whether the policy stakes clear the bar for an international readership. Scopes the question; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Jru Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose of a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) manuscript must convey a decision model and its measurement with precision. Sharpens abstract, intro, and exposition for a risk/uncertainty audience; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jse Tju Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final submission preflight for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), including the official submission domain, account registration, initial screening, manuscript files, template, originality, verified fees, copyright, revised-file upload, contact verification, and fraud prevention without inventing anonymity or review-cycle rules.

1k repo stars
▌
Jse Tju Validation · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing and designing evidence for a manuscript submitted to 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), with separate standards for numerical experiments, simulation, real data, case studies, out-of-sample prediction, optimization comparisons, and empirical research on financial or socioeconomic systems.

1k repo stars
▌
Jwe Transmission Channel · brycewang-stanford
Use when a 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy) manuscript stops at "it promoted exports" without showing how an external shock propagates — making the trade / investment / financial / expectation channel explicit and testable, not a hand-wavy mechanism paragraph.

1k repo stars
▌
Mathfin Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when articulating the contribution of a Mathematical Finance (Wiley) manuscript — frame the methodological novelty and its payoff for financial modelling (pricing, hedging, risk, portfolio, microstructure) so editor and referees see why the theorem matters, not just that it is true.

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr Hypothesis Development · brycewang-stanford
Use to develop hypotheses for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) so each is backed by an explicit theoretical mechanism, not intuition. Use when hypotheses read as "we expect a positive relationship", when mediation/moderation logic is asserted without a mechanism, or when the hypothesis set is not derived from the theory invoked in the introduction.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Transparency And Data · brycewang-stanford
Use when handling research ethics, transparency, and data sharing for a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript — consent and anonymization, the ethics of scraping and platform ToS, qualitative analytic transparency, and any quantitative data/code sharing. Prepares ethics and documentation; it does not over-state requirements.

1k repo stars
▌
Orgstud Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when sharpening the one-sentence theoretical contribution of an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript and the intro/discussion claims that carry it. Frames the contribution; it does not build the theory (see orgstud-theory-development) or run analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Pom Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the revision and point-by-point response after a Production and Operations Management (POM) revise-and-resubmit — addressing the Department Editor and referees, splitting changes between the main paper and the e-companion, and respecting the 32-page cap. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (pom-review-process).

1k repo stars
▌
Pom Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which pom-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills, and it identifies your method track (analytical / empirical / behavioral / data-science).

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Boundary Conditions · brycewang-stanford
Use when setting the scope of a Psychological Review theory — what it explains, what it does NOT, and (for formal models) whether its parameters are identifiable. Bounds the theory; it does NOT derive its predictions (psychrev-argument-development) or frame its advance over rivals (psychrev-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Conceptual Exhibits · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the figures of a Psychological Review manuscript — model/architecture diagrams and simulation-of-model-behavior plots (NOT experiments). Builds the exhibits; it does NOT derive the predictions they display (psychrev-argument-development) or set the model's scope (psychrev-boundary-conditions).

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Theory Construction · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the actual theory or formal/computational model for a Psychological Review manuscript — turning a framed problem into explicit assumptions, mechanisms, formal structure, and derivations. Constructs the model; it does NOT derive and test predictions against data (that is psychrev-argument-development) or set scope and identifiability limits (psychrev-boundary-conditions).

1k repo stars
▌
Psci Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a Psychological Science manuscript against the literature within the journal's tight word budget. With roughly 40 references and a 2,000-word Introduction+Discussion, positioning must be sharp — establish the gap and the contribution fast. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature review.

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand how Public Administration Review (PAR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review, desk screening for fit/scope/practice-relevance, the reject / major / minor / accept decision spectrum, the role of Evidence for Practice, and the article types. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and communicate effect magnitude to scholars and practitioners alike. PAR excludes tables/figures/appendices from the 8,000-word count, but exhibits still must earn their space. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Qe Identification Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for a Quantitative Economics (QE) manuscript — whether causal identification in an empirical design, parameter identification in a structural/computational model, or treatment-effect identification in an experiment. Stress-tests the strategy to the QE general-interest quantitative bar before exhibits are finalized.

1k repo stars
▌
Qje Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the causal identification strategy is the bottleneck for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) manuscript — RCT, staggered DID, IV, RDD, event study. Stress-tests the design to the QJE general-interest bar before tables are drafted.

1k repo stars
▌
Qje Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when finalizing the main exhibits of a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) manuscript — making the paper figure-forward, with clean tables and self-contained notes that read well in QJE's single-PDF, author-date format. Designs exhibits; it does not run new analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Revacc Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running and reporting the empirical analysis for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) manuscript — standard-error clustering, executing the identification, validating accounting constructs, and the robustness battery referees expect, plus the data provenance trail. Executes and reports; it does not choose the identification strategy (revacc-methods) or frame the contribution (revacc-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Revacc Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose is the bottleneck for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) manuscript — front-loading the contribution, writing an abstract and introduction that land, and adopting the accounting house voice. Polishes the manuscript; it does not sharpen the contribution claim (revacc-contribution-framing) or build exhibits (revacc-tables-figures).

1k repo stars
▌
Restud Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when evaluating whether a research idea clears the REStud top-5 bar, or when sharpening a fuzzy idea into one clean original contribution for a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript. Diagnoses fit and contribution; does not draft prose or design empirics.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Replication And Data Policy · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the Review of Finance (RoF) replication package — code, data, pseudo-datasets for proprietary sources such as Datastream or Bankscope, log files, the Data Availability Statement, dataset citations, cover-letter exception requests at initial submission, and OUP supplementary hosting, since the journal's code-sharing policy can hold publication until programs are received.

1k repo stars
▌
Rfs Internet Appendix · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in the journal-hosted Internet Appendix vs. the main paper for a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript, and how to structure it. Organizes supplementary material; does NOT generate the robustness content itself.

1k repo stars
▌
Ssi Author Response · brycewang-stanford
当收到《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 外审意见、需要撰写审稿意见答复信与修回说明时调用。指导如何逐条回应每位审稿人与编委的意见、在修改稿中标注对应位置、以数据与理由而非情绪回应质疑、区分"已修改/已澄清/保留并说明"、处理相互矛盾的意见、控制修回轮次与时限，并保持中文学术礼节。适用于退修（大修/小修）后的 revise-and-resubmit 阶段，与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 的修回习惯相通但以本刊中文流程为准。

1k repo stars
▌
Ssi Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
当需要为投往《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 的稿件保证实验可重复、结果可复现，并撰写数据/代码可用性叙述时调用。覆盖实验环境与来源固定（数据集版本、工具链、随机种子、硬件平台）、仿真与实测/硅后结果的区分、统计报告与随机性控制、跨子学科（计算机/控制/通信/微电子）的可复现要点，以及诚实的可用性声明。作为国家级大信息学科综合旗舰，本刊强调科学价值与可信证据，与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 的开放科学精神一致。

1k repo stars
▌
Ssi Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
当需要判断一项信息科学成果是否适合投《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI)、该投中文版还是英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences、以及应选哪个栏目（评述/论文/快报/学术介绍）时调用。覆盖本刊的科学价值与创新高度门槛、与兄弟刊（计算机学报/自动化学报/电子学报/通信学报/软件学报）的分流、中英文择一投稿关系、大信息学科（计算机/控制/通信/微电子）的适配，以及换核检验等选题自查方法。适用于动笔前的选题与投向决策。

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Boundary Conditions · brycewang-stanford
Use when specifying the scope, domain, and limits of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript's theory — stating where it holds, where it does not, and what it does NOT claim. Bounds the theory as a contribution; it does NOT build the concepts (soctheory-theory-construction) or audit the reasoning (soctheory-argument-development).

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Conceptual Exhibits · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the figures and typologies of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — mechanism diagrams, process models, 2x2 typologies, and concept maps that carry theoretical work (never regression tables or data plots). Designs conceptual exhibits; it does NOT build the underlying theory (soctheory-theory-construction) or write the prose (soctheory-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Theory Construction · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the actual theory for a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — turning a positioned problem into defined concepts, explicit mechanisms, internally consistent propositions, and scope conditions. Constructs the theory; it does NOT stress-test the argument's validity against rivals (soctheory-argument-development) or set the domain limits (soctheory-boundary-conditions).

1k repo stars
▌
Artbull Structure And Exposition · brycewang-stanford
Use when organizing an Art Bulletin article so the argument unfolds clearly and the figures are integrated at the right moments within the ~16,000-word limit including endnotes. Art-historical exposition must move the reader through the objects, not around them. Shapes structure; it does not write the prose or do the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Worlddev Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when staking a World Development (WD) manuscript's contribution across the multidisciplinary development literature. Sharpens the gap and the claim; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Amann Editor Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or draft the response letter (amann-revision).

1k repo stars
▌
Amann Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the review's animating problem; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Asq Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see asq-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Asq Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use for full-manuscript prose and narrative craft on an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — voice, structure, and the storytelling ASQ is known for. Polishes the writing; it does not change the theory or analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Journal Of Climate · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Journal of Climate or deciding whether a climate-dynamics or climate-variability manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the large-scale-climate-science bar, model-evaluation and statistical-rigor expectations, AMS house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Arecon Proposal Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when getting a review topic in front of the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee or shaping an accepted invitation — the commissioned/invited intake route, how to suggest a topic, and what a Committee-ready pitch contains. Frames the commission; it does not gather the literature (arecon-literature-synthesis) or run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Arpsych Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the summary tables and conceptual figures for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review — the who-found-what tables and the one framework diagram that carries the spine. Designs exhibits; it does not design the spine itself (arpsych-organizing-framework) or run a meta-analysis (arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility).

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) revise-and-resubmit. The response must convert each of the (usually two-plus) double-blind referees while keeping the editor confident the revision is convergent. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Bjps Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any British Journal of Political Science (BJPS / BJPolS) manuscript. Routes to the right BJPS sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and which of the three formats (Research Article, Letter, Comment) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Sociological Studies · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《社会学研究》(Sociological Studies) — the CASS flagship sociology journal. Apply to social stratification, family, networks, urban/rural, work, and institutions, supporting both quantitative survey analysis (CGSS/CFPS/CLDS) and qualitative ethnography. Emphasizes dialogue with sociological theory over econometric policy evaluation; reframes economics-style papers toward a sociological problematic.

1k repo stars
▌
The Lancet Public Health · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Lancet Public Health or deciding whether a population-health study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the population-level intervention, epidemiology, and policy evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, Lancet specialty house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Conbio Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a Conservation Biology manuscript against the literature so it reads as a novel, transferable contribution to conservation science. Conservation Biology readers span ecology, social science, and practice, so the paper must engage the relevant conservation literatures and state the gap precisely. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature review.

1k repo stars
▌
Car Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running and reporting the analysis for a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — the right estimator for archival/capital-markets, experimental, or analytical-calibration work, robustness, and CAR's Data Integrity & Code Sharing Policy (code archiving, variable definitions, data availability statement). Executes and reports; it does not design the study (car-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Car Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose of a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — a front-loaded research question, disciplined accounting terminology, the ≤300-word abstract that states question/predictions/method/findings/implications, and CAR Style Guide conventions (footnotes not endnotes, author-date references on a new page). Polishes prose; it does not run the submission preflight (car-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Ectheory Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use to stake an Econometric Theory (ET) contribution against the existing theory frontier — which assumptions you weaken, which limit result you generalize, what was previously unproven — using APA author-date citations, not a standalone literature survey.

1k repo stars
▌
The Burlington Magazine · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Burlington Magazine or deciding whether a connoisseurship, attribution, or object-based art-history manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as the leading venue for connoisseurship, attribution, provenance, and museum/exhibition scholarship, the evidentiary bar for object-based claims, primary-source command, house style, image-rights expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Classical Quarterly · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Classical Quarterly (CQ) or deciding whether a Greek or Latin philology, textual-criticism, or literary-interpretation manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's classical-philology fit, the textual-command argument bar, original-language and critical expectations, classics house style and anonymization norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Journal Of Religion · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Journal of Religion or deciding whether a religious-studies manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its argument/evidence bar, textual/comparative and constructive-analytic expectations, house style and review norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Acs Central Science · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACS Central Science (ACS Cent. Sci.) or deciding whether a chemistry manuscript fits this open-access, broad, high-impact venue for chemistry of central importance. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Cell Biology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Cell Biology or deciding whether a cell-biology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Microbiology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Microbiology (Nat Microbiol) or deciding whether a microbiology or microbial-ecology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Neuroscience · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) or deciding whether a neuroscience manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Lancet Oncology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Lancet Oncology or deciding whether a clinical oncology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Financial Management · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Financial Management (FM) or deciding whether an applied corporate-finance manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Journal Of Marketing · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Journal of Marketing (JM) or deciding whether a marketing manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Mathematical Finance · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Mathematical Finance or deciding whether a quantitative / mathematical-finance manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Organization Science · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Organization Science (OrgSci) or deciding whether an organization theory / behavior / innovation manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Organization Studies · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Organization Studies (OS) or deciding whether a European organization-theory / process / institutional / critical manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Economic Journal · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Economic Journal (EJ) or deciding whether a general-interest economics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Eursr Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript — comparative cross-national designs, panel/longitudinal and event-history designs, multilevel structures, and causal inference where feasible on harmonized survey or register data. ESR judges whether the design lets the comparison or panel identify the mechanism. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Eursr Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical argument of a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript into a portable mechanism with testable hypotheses — typically a macro–micro (institution → individual outcome) account suited to comparative or longitudinal quantitative work. ESR rewards a mechanism that travels over a coefficient bound to one country or wave. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Eursr Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a sociology project fits the European Sociological Review (ESR) and whether to write a full Article, a Comment/Reply, or a Data Brief. ESR is Europe's flagship quantitative-sociology journal, so the test is a portable mechanism studied with a rigorous comparative or longitudinal quantitative design. Frames the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Expecon Replication Package · brycewang-stanford
Use when assembling the data, code, instructions, and experiment software for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript to meet the ESA reproducibility standard. Builds the deposit; it does not run the analysis or draft prose.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 23 of 53