brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
3 weeks ago last updated

▌
Fcr Reporting And Data Policy · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the reporting completeness and research-data materials for a Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscript. FCR requires a data-availability statement at submission, full agronomic reporting (cultivar, soil, weather vs. phenology, management, design), declaration of any generative-AI use, and supports data/methods co-submission to Data in Brief / MethodsX. Prepares the materials; it does not waive requirements.

1k repo stars
▌
Cte Policy Implication · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of a 《财贸经济》 manuscript. Frames implications at the significance / institutional level but anchored in concrete Chinese fiscal / financial / trade policy levers — not the empty "加强完善推进" formula. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when the contribution of a Financial Management (FM) manuscript relative to the published finance frontier is fuzzy, oversold, or indistinguishable from a specialist sibling. Stakes the marginal contribution and the sibling boundary; it does not run analysis or draft the intro prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Gec Figures And Tables · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the figures, tables, framework diagrams, and maps for a Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscript, plus the required Highlights. GEC reaches an interdisciplinary, policy-relevant audience, so exhibits must be self-contained and legible across disciplines. Improves exhibits; it does not fabricate data.

1k repo stars
▌
Ier Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating referee objections before submitting an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript, or when reading the room of an IER review. Maps the likely objections by archetype and pre-empts them; it does not draft the response letter (see ier-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Jae Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing to submit to the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE) — the Editorial Manager preflight, submission-fee live check, double-anonymized file separation (anonymized manuscript plus title page), mandatory Highlights, keywords and JEL codes, and Elsevier author-date formatting.

1k repo stars
▌
Jar Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript — testing whether it is a real accounting question with a credible setting, JAR fit, and identification potential before any data work begins. Locks the question; it does not build the mechanism (jar-theory-development) or design the test (jar-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Jape Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running estimation and inference for a Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) manuscript so the analysis is reproducible and archive-ready — every table/figure regeneratable from plain-text data and programs you will deposit in the JAE Data Archive. Covers robust inference, master-script discipline, Monte Carlo evidence, and the archive's plain-ASCII/CSV format rule.

1k repo stars
▌
Jape Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing prose for a Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) manuscript to its house conventions — a 100-word citation-free summary, up to six keywords, sectioned structure, a conflict-of-interest statement, acknowledgments that do not thank reviewers, and citation-style-agnostic Free Format references.

1k repo stars
▌
Joap Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether an I-O / applied-psychology project fits the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) and which article type to target. JAP wants a genuine theoretical contribution to work-and-organizational science backed by rigorous measurement, not a rigorous study with no theoretical advance. Frames the question and tests fit; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbf Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether an empirical or theoretical finance manuscript fits the Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF) scope, especially banking, financial intermediation, financial institutions, capital markets, investments, corporate finance, or financial regulation.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcp Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a consumer phenomenon belongs at the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) versus a sibling, and which JCP manuscript type fits, before theory and studies are locked. Sets scope and outlet fit; it does not build the mechanism (jcp-theory-development).

1k repo stars
▌
Jde Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when estimation, heterogeneity, attrition, measurement, or inference choices need to meet Journal of Development Economics (JDE) empirical norms — clustered field data, survey measurement error, and treatment-effect heterogeneity in low- and middle-income settings. Covers the analysis itself, not the identifying design.

1k repo stars
▌
Jde Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing prose for a Journal of Development Economics (JDE) manuscript so the development question, answer, and policy stakes land for a field audience. A late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before identification and framing are settled.

1k repo stars
▌
Joe Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when the contribution of a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) manuscript relative to the econometrics literature is fuzzy or undersold. Locates the paper precisely against the nearest estimators, tests, and asymptotic results so referees see the methodological delta.

1k repo stars
▌
Jegeo Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the inference argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript — spatial causal designs, quantitative-spatial model identification, or case-based geographic inference. Stress-tests the strategy to JEG's two-community bar before exhibits are finalized.

1k repo stars
▌
Jegeo Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when exhibits — especially maps — for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript are dense, decorative, or do not answer the spatial question. Makes maps and tables argue; it does not invent results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jel Editor Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or draft the response letter (jel-revision).

1k repo stars
▌
Jel Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a literature is a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL)-scale survey topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of synthesis — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the survey's animating question; it does not gather or synthesize the literature (that is jel-literature-synthesis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jep Narrative Arc · brycewang-stanford
Use when structuring a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article as a story/argument for a general economist reader rather than a literature survey. Builds the essay's spine (hook → tension → synthesis → takeaways); it does not handle sentence-level voice or evidence presentation.

1k repo stars
▌
Jep Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising sentence-level voice and the abstract/opening for a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article — engaging, clear, authoritative-but-readable, minimal notation. Polishes prose and front matter; defer structure to jep-narrative-arc and evidence framing to jep-evidence-without-equations.

1k repo stars
▌
Cfe Heterogeneity · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or writing heterogeneity analysis for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics manuscript. Enforces five-dimension priority and theoretical-justification discipline.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfe Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or framing a topic for a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript and you need to test fit and contribution before investing in data work. Pressure-tests the question and contribution; it does not write the literature review or design the empirics.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfi Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) via Editorial Manager — the US$500 non-refundable new-submission fee, the system-built review PDF, a <=250-word abstract, 1-7 English keywords, optional Highlights and SSRN preprint, Option C data links/statements, and the mandatory generative-AI disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfm Internet Appendix · brycewang-stanford
Use when assembling the Internet Appendix, data codebook, and replication materials for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — what stays in the main text vs. the appendix, and the TAQ/proprietary-data access path. Organizes supporting material; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmgmt Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when the contribution-relative-to-prior-work is the bottleneck for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — staking the gap against the right conversation and against sibling journals (AMJ, SMJ, JMS, Org Science). Positions the paper; it does not build the theory (jmgmt-theory-development) or write the discussion (jmgmt-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Jmf Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript — longitudinal and life-course designs, dyadic and family-level analysis, family-demographic methods, experiments, and qualitative/multi-method designs. JMF judges each tradition on its own terms and is alert to selection. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmf Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a project fits the Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) and whether it should be a full article or a brief report. JMF is the interdisciplinary flagship of family science, so the test is a genuine contribution to understanding families and close relationships, not a generic social-science finding. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Jom Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for a Journal of Operations Management (JOM) empirical manuscript — measurement validity for survey constructs, identification and endogeneity for archival operations data, manipulation checks for behavioral-OM experiments, and robustness. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (jom-methods) or frame the contribution (jom-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Jom Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing prose for a Journal of Operations Management (JOM) empirical manuscript — front-loading the operations argument, writing for both academics and practitioners, keeping APA house style, and meeting JOM's length, formatting, and text-overlap rules.

1k repo stars
▌
Jru Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when identifying a risk or uncertainty parameter is the bottleneck for a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) manuscript — incentive-compatible elicitation in an experiment, or structural/empirical estimation of risk preferences, VSL, or insurance demand. Stress-tests how the data pin the primitive; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jru Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when exhibits for a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) manuscript must make choice patterns and risk-parameter estimates legible. Improves tables and figures for a risk/uncertainty audience; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jue Replication Package · brycewang-stanford
Use when assembling the data and code deposit for a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript under its mandatory replication policy — especially geocoded, restricted, or proprietary spatial data. Builds the JUE-compliant replication folder and confidentiality path; it does not run the analysis or write the prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Jonc Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford
在处理《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 稿件的代码与数据可用性问题时调用。讲清本刊作为中文通信期刊目前没有独立于正文评审的"制品/工件徽章"(artifact badge) 制度这一现状，指导在没有正式制品评审的前提下，如何通过开放代码/数据/复现包、规范数据可用性声明、匿名评审仓库、仿真参数与信道实现公开等方式，主动提升通信实验的可信度与可复现性，帮助作者把可用性材料组织到既符合本刊三审制评审关注点、又不误称本刊有官方徽章制度的程度，适用于物理层、网络、安全与信号处理方向的中文长文。

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr Discussion Contribution · brycewang-stanford
Use to write the discussion section for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) so it loops back to the introduction's gap and advances a management theory — extension, boundary condition, or integration — rather than restating results. Use when the discussion only summarizes findings, or when the theoretical-contribution paragraph repeats the hypotheses without saying what changed in the theory.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when situating a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript in the right interdisciplinary conversation and naming the specific gap or rival account it advances. Builds the positioning; it does not build the theory or design.

1k repo stars
▌
Orgsci Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning an Organization Science manuscript in the literature — identifying the organization-theory conversation it joins, problematizing rather than gap-spotting, and integrating across the disciplines (organization theory, strategy, sociology, economics, psychology) the journal draws on.

1k repo stars
▌
Popdevr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) revise-and-resubmit. PDR review is double-anonymized and cross-field (demographers and development scholars), so the response must convert every expert reviewer on population substance and on the development meaning, without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Popdevr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when starting or orienting any Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) manuscript and unsure which skill applies — the entry-point router that dispatches to the right PDR sub-skill by lifecycle stage and article type (Research Article, Notes & Commentary, Data & Perspectives, Archives, Book Review). It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Phg Argument Synthesis · brycewang-stanford
Use when turning a mapped literature into one cumulative argument for a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay — synthesizing many sources into a claim the field could not see from any one of them. Builds the synthetic spine; it does not gather sources (see phg-literature-positioning) or make the critical turn (see phg-critical-intervention).

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Argument Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when deriving predictions from a Psychological Review theory and confronting them with existing data and rival models — the journal's substitute for an empirical results section. Develops the argument; it does NOT build the model (psychrev-theory-construction) or set its scope and identifiability limits (psychrev-boundary-conditions).

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when articulating the theoretical advance of a Psychological Review manuscript — what the field can explain after the paper that it could not before, stated against the specific prior models it improves on. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the model (psychrev-theory-construction) or position it in the literature (psychrev-literature-positioning).

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript — public-management causal designs (DiD around reforms, survey & field experiments on bureaucrats/citizens, RD, IV), case comparison and process tracing, and mixed methods. PAR judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical argument of a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript into a contribution that advances public-management theory and informs practice. PAR rewards a clear, portable mechanism with explicit scope conditions plus a defensible practitioner "so-what." Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a public-administration project fits Public Administration Review (PAR) and which article type to target. PAR is the practice-bridging ASPA flagship, so the test is dual — a scholarly advance AND a credible "so-what" for public managers. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Poq Theory And Hypotheses · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript — whether the contribution is to opinion/communication theory or to survey methodology. POQ rewards explicit constructs, mechanisms, and testable hypotheses, and methods papers need a clear claim about a survey-error source. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Qje Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or pressure-testing a research question for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) submission — checks fit, the "big idea" bar, and breadth of the takeaway for QJE's general-interest readership. Diagnoses scope fit; it does not design the empirics.

1k repo stars
▌
Rje Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use to frame the contribution of a manuscript for The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) so the industrial-organization advance is legible to the screening Editor and two referees within the hard page caps. Sharpens the one-sentence "so what"; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Revacc Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when calibrating expectations for the Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) review cycle — its fast, first-round-decision culture, double-blind process, the RAST Conference path, and when to consider a sibling venue. Sets expectations and strategy; it does not run the submission preflight (revacc-submission) or draft the response letter (revacc-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Revacc Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when the exhibits are the bottleneck for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) manuscript — building self-contained accounting panel tables, event-study and equilibrium figures, and a descriptive-statistics block that survives referee scrutiny. Builds the exhibits; it does not run the analysis (revacc-data-analysis) or polish the surrounding prose (revacc-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Restud Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating the referee pool and their likely objections for a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript, and when pre-empting those objections in the paper before submission. Maps reviewers and hardens the paper against them; does not write the rebuttal (that is restud-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Restat Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) has arrived and the manuscript needs a response-to-referees letter and a revision plan. Drafts the response strategy; it does not run new analysis (route that to the analysis skills).

1k repo stars
▌
Restat Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which restat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Revedres Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript via Manuscript Central — masking, APA 7, the 150-word abstract, file set, and reporting-standard attachments. Checks readiness to submit; it does not negotiate scope (revedres-editor-strategy) or handle the decision letter (revedres-revision).

1k repo stars
▌
Socs Mechanism Social Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to translate coefficients or fieldwork materials into a social process for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — specifying who, via what mechanism, under what structural conditions, forms what social outcome or structure. Use when results stop at significance or at a vivid story without an explicit mechanism.

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Argument Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when stress-testing the reasoning of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — turning stated propositions into a valid, warranted argument that survives rival theories and counter-cases. Develops and audits the argument; it does NOT define the concepts (soctheory-theory-construction) or bound the theory's domain (soctheory-boundary-conditions).

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when articulating the theoretical contribution of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — naming the new way of seeing it provides and differentiating it from prior theory. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the theory (soctheory-theory-construction) or audit its reasoning (soctheory-argument-development).

1k repo stars
▌
Ectj Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when sharpening a contribution for The Econometrics Journal (EctJ) into a compact leading-case claim with demonstrated applied value, covering the failure mode of incumbent methods, the smallest sharp advance, the applied payoff, and scope guardrails that survive the one-week RES desk screen.

1k repo stars
▌
Amann Proposal Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the short proposal that gates an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the ≤5-page, four-heading proposal submitted under the twice-yearly deadlines before any full review is invited. Builds the proposal; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or run the portal preflight (amann-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Amr Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the actual theory for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — turning a positioned puzzle into defined constructs, explicit relationships, propositions, and boundary conditions. Constructs the theory; it does NOT stress-test the argument's logic (that is amr-data-analysis) or design any data collection (AMR has none).

1k repo stars
▌
Aos Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — Editorial Manager files (anonymized manuscript, separate title page, declarations), Elsevier policies (competing interests, AI, ethics), and open-access decisions. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (aos-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Asq Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when understanding and navigating Administrative Science Quarterly's (ASQ) developmental, multi-round review process — decision types, reviewer/editor roles, and what each stage expects. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (see asq-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Asq Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building and refining exhibits for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative data structures and data-to-theory tables, process models, and quantitative tables. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis behind them.

1k repo stars
▌
Agsy Data And Model Evaluation · brycewang-stanford
Use when evaluating the model and analyzing results for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it survives expert systems review — independent model evaluation (observed vs. simulated, fit statistics), sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, and trade-off / scenario analysis across the system. Guides evaluation norms; it does not fabricate results or run the model.

1k repo stars
▌
Aerj Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) revise-and-resubmit. AERJ R&Rs come back through the handling editor and multiple masked reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident the revision is convergent. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Aerj Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript. Routes to the right AERJ sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether the manuscript's field-wide education-research fit is clear. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Ahr Argument Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when turning archival findings into a sustained historical argument for The American Historical Review (AHR). The AHR rewards a clear thesis that earns its claims from evidence while remaining alert to contingency and complexity. Builds the argument and its stakes; it does not gather new sources or fabricate evidence.

1k repo stars
▌
Ahr Sources And Archives · brycewang-stanford
Use when handling primary sources and archives for an American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript — distinguishing primary from secondary, criticizing sources, citing manuscripts and collections in Chicago notes, and clearing image permissions. The AHR judges history on the quality and criticism of its evidence. Strengthens source work; it does not invent archival material.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajps Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to an American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) revise-and-resubmit. The revised manuscript stays double-blind, the response memorandum is submitted anonymized, and any new analyses must keep the replication package re-runnable for the third-party verifier at acceptance. Structures the response; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajps Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) manuscript. Routes to the right AJPS sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and which submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence) fits, and reminds you that AJPS re-runs your code via a third-party verifier before publishing. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Arpsych Editor Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when managing scope, length, deadlines, and the production relationship with the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor and Annual Reviews production team. Handles the editorial/production process; it does not get the initial invitation (arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning) or run the final file preflight (arpsych-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Arpsych Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a psychology topic is mature, important, and synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review. Tests topic fit; it does not pitch the topic to the Committee (arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning) or gather the literature (arpsych-literature-synthesis).

1k repo stars
▌
Cjms Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to referee reports from 《中国管理科学》 (Chinese Journal of Management Science) — classifying comments, planning supplementary experiments or derivations, and drafting the point-by-point 修改说明. Works after the manuscript has actually been revised; it never fabricates changes.

1k repo stars
▌
Cjms Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which cjms-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a 《中国管理科学》 (Chinese Journal of Management Science) manuscript from topic selection through rebuttal. The key fork is 优化建模 vs 数据驱动预测 vs 金融工程实证 — three strands the journal publishes side by side. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Cpa Literature Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript, when the public-administration theory anchor is missing, or when the Chinese-governance / international-PA reference balance is off.

1k repo stars
▌
Economic Perspectives · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《经济学动态》(Economic Perspectives — 中国社会科学院主管、经济研究所主办的理论经济学月刊, 1960 年创刊, CSSCI) or deciding whether a Chinese econ manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Finance And Economics · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《财经科学》(Finance and Economics — 西南财经大学主办的月刊, 1957 创刊, 西部最早的经济理论刊物, 不收费) or deciding whether a finance/public-finance/regional-economy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fee-free policy, 关键词3–8/参考文献≥5条/顺序编码制 house style, official re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Journal Of Management · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《管理学刊》(Journal of Management — 新乡学院与中国社会主义经济规律系统研究会主办的经济与管理类双月刊, 2009 年改刊, CSSCI/北大核心) or deciding whether a Chinese econ/management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, double-blind review timeline, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Management Science Cn · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《管理科学》(Management Science — 哈尔滨工业大学管理学院主办的管理科学与工程类双月刊, 1987 年创刊, 管理科学与工程学会会刊) or deciding whether a Chinese management/management-science manuscript fits this venue. 注意本刊为中文期刊《管理科学》, 与美国 INFORMS 的 Management Science 同名不同刊。Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/length house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
World Economic Papers · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《世界经济文汇》(World Economic Papers — 复旦大学经济学院主办的双月刊, 国内较早实行双向匿名审稿的经济学刊) or deciding whether an international-economics/open-economy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's double-blind review, 摘要≤200字/3关键词/音序参考文献 house style, official re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Cogpsych Theory And Hypotheses · brycewang-stanford
Use when stating the theory, formalizing the model, and deriving predictions for a Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) manuscript. The journal rewards a formal/computational account whose parameters mean something and whose predictions discriminate it from rivals. Structures the theory and the model that the experiments test; it does not fit the model or run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Car Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand how Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) evaluates a manuscript — the double-anonymous, two-reviewer process, the role of the subject Editor and the EIC who approves all acceptances, generative-AI rules for reviewers, and CAR's formal appeals process. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (car-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Car Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the exhibits of a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — descriptive/correlation/results tables for archival work, experimental cell-means and ANOVA tables, model figures, and appendices — formatted to the CAR Style Guide (each exhibit on a new page, variable definitions, footnotes not endnotes). Builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (car-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Epsl Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) via Editorial Manager — letters-format length check, title page and highlights, declarations (competing interests, authorship, AI use), data-availability statement with repository DOIs, and figure/table file compliance. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectheory Identification Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when the assumptions, regularity conditions, and asymptotic results are the bottleneck for an Econometric Theory (ET) theorem-proof paper — adapt "identification" to mean stating defensible assumptions, proving the limit theory, and establishing generality, not causal design.

1k repo stars
▌
The Philosophical Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the argument-rigor and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Molecular Psychiatry · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Molecular Psychiatry (Mol Psychiatry) or deciding whether a biological psychiatry or translational neuroscience manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Biotechnology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Biotechnology or deciding whether a biotechnology/enabling-methods manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Lancet Neurology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Lancet Neurology or deciding whether a clinical neurology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Accounting Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Accounting Review (TAR) or deciding whether an accounting manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Est Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) via the ACS Publishing Center / ACS Paragon Plus — article-type and word-limit checks, the mandatory TOC graphic, Supporting Information, data-availability statement, ACS style, ORCID, and ethics/COI declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Eer Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when the contribution-vs-frontier claim is fuzzy, oversold, or under-cited for a European Economic Review (EER) manuscript spanning any field of economics. Sharpens the gap and the marginal contribution; it does not fix identification or prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Gcb Reporting And Data Policy · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the data availability statement and the data/code archive for a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript. GCB requires data and code to be archived in a public repository with a persistent DOI as a condition of publication, and "available on request" is not accepted. Prepares the deposit; it does not waive requirements.

1k repo stars
▌
Isr Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or refining the mechanism for an Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscript — deriving behavioral hypotheses for empirical work or analytical propositions/equilibrium predictions for modeling work, always centered on the IT artifact and the sociotechnical interplay across levels of analysis. Builds the theory; it does not test it (isr-methods, isr-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jape Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when navigating the Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) editorial process — single-blind peer review by anonymous reviewers in addition to the Editor, with final accept/reject authority vested in the Editor-in-Chief, plus the three-papers-under-review cap and the rule that rejected papers are not resubmittable unless invited.

1k repo stars
▌
Jape Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) manuscript under the hard 35-page article limit — keeping core exhibits in the main text while pushing extended results into the unlimited online appendix, and ensuring every exhibit is regeneratable for the JAE Data Archive.

1k repo stars
▌
Joc Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a field-wide contribution. JoC readers span communication subfields and traditions, so the paper must engage the literatures they expect rather than only a single platform or topic niche. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcr Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the conceptual core of a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) manuscript — the psychological process and hypotheses for an experiments paper, or the interpretive theorization for a Consumer Culture Theory (CCT) paper. Builds the mechanism; it does not run the studies (jcr-methods/jcr-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jde Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing a submission route or understanding how peer review works at the Journal of Development Economics (JDE) — the full-length, AER-Insights-style short-paper, and pre-results review (Registered Reports) tracks, single-anonymized review, timelines, and the submission cap. Explains the pipeline; it is not the final preflight.

1k repo stars
▌
Jde Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the main exhibits for a Journal of Development Economics (JDE) manuscript — figure-forward presentation of treatment effects, heterogeneity, and event studies for development settings, with self-contained notes. Shapes exhibits; it does not run the estimation.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 24 of 53