← all publishers

brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

Report this profile Claim this profile

• 5.3k skills
• 0 followers
• 1k repo stars
• 2 weeks ago last updated

1. ▌
   Icalp Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

   Use to understand why ICALP (EATCS) has no artifact-evaluation track or badge scheme, and what plays the equivalent role for a pure-theory paper — the full version with complete proofs, reproducible computational certificates, and optional machine formalization — so authors coming from a systems/ML venue do not waste effort building an artifact ICALP does not evaluate.
   1k repo stars
2. ▌
   Icsme Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

   Use when packaging an IEEE ICSME artifact for the Joint Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival, covering the IEEE "Open Research Object" and "Research Object Reviewed" badges, what evaluators check first, DOI-issuing archives, evaluator-proof documentation, the shared track with SCAM and VISSOFT, and the separate post-acceptance deadline.
   1k repo stars
3. ▌
   Ijcai Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

   Use when packaging IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI code, data, proofs, models, and appendices as reproducibility evidence or supplementary material, especially when there is no separate artifact-evaluation badge but reviewers need convincing, anonymous, deadline-safe evidence.
   1k repo stars
4. ▌
   Infocom Author Response · brycewang-stanford

   Use when handling the IEEE INFOCOM post-submission reality — that the venue has traditionally offered no author rebuttal — covering how to write a self-defending submission, how to read and act on an early-reject, what to do after a final reject, and how to use any response window a given cycle does introduce (verify per cycle).
   1k repo stars
5. ▌
   Infocom Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford

   Use when strengthening IEEE INFOCOM reproducibility even though the venue runs no formal artifact-evaluation track, covering pinned simulator setups, released code and datasets where possible, complete proofs and parameters within the page budget, IEEE reproducibility-badge options, and consistency between what the paper claims and what a reader could rebuild.
   1k repo stars
6. ▌
   Infocom Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

   Use when deciding whether a networking project belongs at IEEE INFOCOM or should be routed to SIGCOMM, NSDI, MobiCom, ICNP, or an IEEE/ACM networking journal (ToN, JSAC), distinguishing INFOCOM by its breadth, its analytical/optimization tradition alongside systems, and the modeling-vs-building axis.
   1k repo stars
7. ▌
   Issta Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

   Use when packaging an ISSTA tool, benchmark, and results for the artifact-evaluation track, covering the ACM badges (Artifacts Available via Zenodo, Evaluated Functional and Reusable, Results Reproduced), the anonymous review-time copy, containerization, a runnable entry point, and what ISSTA artifact evaluators actually try first.
   1k repo stars
8. ▌
   Jm Methods · brycewang-stanford

   Use when choosing and defending the research design for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — matching a "big tent" method (experiment, field study, survey, secondary data, qualitative) to a substantive marketing question, with field realism and identification in mind. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation (jm-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (jm-contribution-framing).
   1k repo stars
9. ▌
   Mksc Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

   Use when drafting the revision and response letter after a Marketing Science revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the Senior/Associate Editor and reviewers across a multi-round process, especially on assumptions, identification, counterfactuals, computation, and replication. Drafts the response after revising; it does not interpret the decision (mksc-review-process).
   1k repo stars
10. ▌
    Mksc Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which mksc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a Marketing Science manuscript from modeling-driven topic selection through R&R rebuttal. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
11. ▌
    Micro Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing a MICRO artifact for post-acceptance evaluation — packaging simulators, configs, traces, and scripts so evaluators can regenerate the paper's figures, targeting the ACM Available/Functional/Reproducible badges, handling licensed workloads and long simulations, and earning the optional artifact appendix.
    1k repo stars
12. ▌
    Mind Revision And Response · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to a Mind decision — a revise-and-resubmit, a reject-with-encouragement, or referee reports to address before resubmitting. The response must answer expert philosophical objections without weakening the thesis, while keeping the manuscript prepared for triple-anonymous review. Structures the revision and the response letter; it does not fabricate new arguments.
    1k repo stars
13. ▌
    Mlsys Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging an accepted MLSys paper's code, configs, and measurement scripts for the venue's post-acceptance artifact evaluation, targeting the Availability, Functional, and Reproducible badges, writing the Artifact Appendix, handling hardware that AE reviewers cannot access, and answering anonymous evaluator questions.
    1k repo stars
14. ▌
    Mobicom Author Response · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing a MobiCom rebuttal after round-two reviews or executing a one-shot revision — triaging reviewer points by severity, fitting a factual, concession-honest rebuttal into its length limit, and turning a required-changes list into a change-highlighted revision with a change summary that the same reviewers can verify.
    1k repo stars
15. ▌
    Mobicom Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford

    Use when making a MobiCom result reproducible on a different testbed — recording radio, hardware, channel, and mobility provenance as the runs happen, characterizing the variance that over-the-air measurement introduces, and deciding early which traces, firmware, and deployment data can legally and safely ship for artifact evaluation.
    1k repo stars
16. ▌
    Mobicom Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project belongs at MobiCom or a sibling venue — testing whether the core contribution is a mobile/wireless-networking mechanism the SIGMOBILE flagship rewards, and routing platform, sensing, broad-networking, security, or ubicomp misfits to MobiSys, SenSys, SIGCOMM/NSDI, WiSec, or IMWUT before a cycle is committed.
    1k repo stars
17. ▌
    Mobisys Author Response · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting a MobiSys rebuttal after round-2 reviews — working within the scope limit (correct factual errors, answer specific reviewer questions), adding only directly-responsive new results, promising camera-ready work honestly, staying double-blind, and giving the area chair a clean rationale for a mobile-systems accept decision.
    1k repo stars
18. ▌
    Mobisys Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford

    Use when strengthening MobiSys reproducibility evidence — capturing device, SoC, OS build, framework and model versions, power-instrument setup, seeds, and thermal conditions so an on-device result survives a different phone, deciding what data and firmware can legally ship, and keeping the paper consistent with the artifact for the ACM badge pipeline.
    1k repo stars
19. ▌
    Mobisys Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project belongs at MobiSys — testing whether the core contribution is a mobile or embedded system, application, or service whose on-device behavior is the result, and routing wireless, sensor-network, distributed-systems, ubicomp, or early-idea misfits to MobiCom, SenSys, NSDI/OSDI, IMWUT, or HotMobile.
    1k repo stars
20. ▌
    Molcell Citation · brycewang-stanford

    Use to convert references to the current Cell Press numbered style used by Molecular Cell — superscript numbers in order of first appearance, a reference list numbered in that order, full author lists (no et al.), abbreviated journal names. This is NOT author-date; older Cell Press author-date manuscripts must be renumbered.
    1k repo stars
21. ▌
    Molcell Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use after Molecular Cell reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize the (often mechanism-completing) new experiments by impact × feasibility, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and closes the mechanistic gaps reviewers demand. Do not run before the experiments and revision are actually done.
    1k repo stars
22. ▌
    Molcell Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which molcell-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from mechanism-fit test through reviewer rebuttal for Molecular Cell (Mol. Cell, Cell Press). Routes to the specialized skills — it does not replace them.
    1k repo stars
23. ▌
    Naacl Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging datasets, models, prompts, or annotation materials for a NAACL-bound submission — building the artifact around the Responsible NLP checklist's artifact questions, documenting provenance and licensing for language data, and handling community-owned or Indigenous-language resources correctly.
    1k repo stars
24. ▌
    Ngeo Revision · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to Nature Geoscience referee reports or editor decisions — point-by-point reply, resubmission, and the Nature Portfolio appeal route. Structures the response and revision; does not redraft the science from scratch.
    1k repo stars
25. ▌
    Ngeo Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which ngeo-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for a Nature Geoscience (Nat. Geosci.) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
26. ▌
    Neurips Author Response · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting or triaging NeurIPS OpenReview author responses, rebuttals, and discussion-period replies under the current year's response mechanics and double-blind constraints.
    1k repo stars
27. ▌
    Neurips Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford

    Use when strengthening NeurIPS reproducibility evidence, aligning Paper Checklist answers with the paper, writing code/data instructions, setting random-seed and compute disclosure, or deciding whether the MLRC/TMLR reproducibility route fits better than the main track or Datasets & Benchmarks track.
    1k repo stars
28. ▌
    Neurips Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a paper belongs at NeurIPS, choosing main-track versus another NeurIPS track, selecting contribution type, or rerouting to a better AI/ML venue.
    1k repo stars
29. ▌
    Ors Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing the proof technique, algorithm, or simulation protocol for an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — choosing the right machinery (duality, dynamic programming, probabilistic coupling, convergence analysis, simulation output analysis) to actually establish the claimed results. Establishes the results; it does not state the model (ors-theory-development) or run the experiments (ors-data-analysis).
    1k repo stars
30. ▌
    Pmla Revision And Response · brycewang-stanford

    Use when revising a PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) essay after a decision and writing the response to readers' reports. PMLA essays receive at least two substantive reports and the Editorial Board decides, so the revision must answer every reader while protecting the argument and keeping the manuscript anonymous. Structures the revision and response; it does not fabricate evidence.
    1k repo stars
31. ▌
    Pmla Scholarly Positioning · brycewang-stanford

    Use when positioning a PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) essay within the critical conversation so it reads as a significant contribution to literary and language studies. PMLA readers span periods, languages, and schools, so the essay must engage the criticism they expect and stake a clear intervention. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature survey.
    1k repo stars
32. ▌
    Pnasnexus Openaccess · brycewang-stanford

    Use to settle PNAS Nexus's open-access decisions — confirm the gold-OA model and the article processing charge (APC), check eligibility for waivers/discounts (low-/middle-income countries, Read & Publish, membership) and funder compliance, and choose the license (CC BY vs CC BY-NC). This is PNAS Nexus's signature pre-submission decision; it replaces flagship PNAS's Direct/Contributed track choice (PNAS Nexus has no such track).
    1k repo stars
33. ▌
    Pnasnexus Statistics · brycewang-stanford

    Use to enforce PNAS Nexus's statistics and reproducibility reporting — n and replication, test choice and assumptions, effect sizes with uncertainty, multiple-comparison control, randomization/blinding, sample-size justification, and reproducible code. Also covers whether a Registered Report (Stage 1/2) is the right route for confirmatory work.
    1k repo stars
34. ▌
    Pnasnexus Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use as the final preflight before submitting to PNAS Nexus — a complete checklist across fit, open access/APC/license, article type & length, Significance Statement, abstract, classification, figures, statistics, data/code, references, and required files. Covers the PNAS-transfer case and bundles a checklist and cover-letter template. Emits GO/NO-GO.
    1k repo stars
35. ▌
    Ppopp Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging a PPoPP artifact for the post-acceptance, CGO-shared artifact-evaluation track, covering PPoPP's specific badge policy (Functional or Reusable plus Results Reproduced, no "Results Replicated"; Available granted by the publisher from a deposit link), reproducible parallel measurements on evaluators' hardware, and the separate AE deadline.
    1k repo stars
36. ▌
    Respol Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting the response to a Research Policy (RP) decision letter — converting double-blind referee and handling-editor comments into a point-by-point response and a revision plan that protects the innovation-studies contribution. Builds the response strategy; it is the terminal skill in the pack.
    1k repo stars
37. ▌
    Respol Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which respol-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
38. ▌
    Sigcomm Author Response · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting an ACM SIGCOMM rebuttal or executing a shepherd-run one-shot revision — triaging reviewer issues, writing a decision-focused anonymous rebuttal for the discussion phase, and building the revision packet (point-by-point response, change-marked manuscript, and list of changes) against the required-changes contract.
    1k repo stars
39. ▌
    Sigcomm Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford

    Use when strengthening the reproducibility evidence of an ACM SIGCOMM paper — topology and testbed ledgers, traffic workload and trace provenance, configuration and version pinning, tail-percentile run counts and variance, legal data-release decisions, and consistency between the paper's claims and the artifact that backs them.
    1k repo stars
40. ▌
    Sigcomm Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project is a strong ACM SIGCOMM fit, choosing the research versus experience track, identifying the networking-stack mechanism at the core of the contribution, and routing misfits to NSDI, MobiCom, CoNEXT, IMC, SIGMETRICS, or a systems venue before writing begins.
    1k repo stars
41. ▌
    Siggraph Supplementary · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning the SIGGRAPH / TOG supplemental package, especially the results video that reviewers weight heavily, plus comparison galleries, additional results, code and data, and appendices, and when deciding what evidence must live in the 7-page body versus the supplemental material.
    1k repo stars
42. ▌
    Siggraph Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when structuring or revising a SIGGRAPH / TOG technical paper, covering the teaser figure, a results-first first page, the graphics contribution framing (technique + quality/performance), comparison-driven evaluation, honest limitations, and the acmart 7-page discipline for the conference track.
    1k repo stars
43. ▌
    Sigir Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging code, run files, test collections, or judgments for a SIGIR submission — deciding between an artifact inside a full/short paper and a standalone Resources track paper, building reviewer-runnable IR repositories, run-file and qrels hygiene, licensing and datasheets, and single- vs double-anonymous handling.
    1k repo stars
44. ▌
    Sf Review Process · brycewang-stanford

    Use to understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne, what expert reviewers weigh (rigor, general significance, theoretical grounding), the typical decision categories, and the journal's reported review timeline. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
    1k repo stars
45. ▌
    Sf Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building tables and figures for a Social Forces (SF) manuscript. SF imposes a hard limit of 10 tables and figure panels and a 10-page supplementary-materials cap, so exhibits must be selected and consolidated deliberately. Designs and rations exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
    1k repo stars
46. ▌
    Socs Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when polishing the language of a 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) manuscript — removing both policy-report tone (加强/完善/推进) and pure-technique tone (method-flexing), and restoring a scholarly sociological register with paragraph-leading topic sentences. Use after the problematic and mechanism are settled.
    1k repo stars
47. ▌
    Tacas Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging a TACAS (ETAPS) artifact for the ETAPS Artifact Badges (Available, Functional, Reusable), covering the two-round model (mandatory, PC-parallel evaluation for tool and tool-demo papers vs voluntary post-acceptance evaluation for research and case-study papers), what the AEC checks on the clean evaluation VM, DOI-issuing archives, and evaluator-proof documentation.
    1k repo stars
48. ▌
    Wp Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford

    Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a World Politics manuscript so it survives expert triple-blind review and the Dataverse replication requirement — honest uncertainty, robustness, and triangulation appropriate to comparative cross-national, qualitative, or formal-empirical work. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.
    1k repo stars
49. ▌
    Wp Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting or polishing a World Politics manuscript so it reads across cases, follows the World Politics house style, and fits the limits (≤ 12,500 words including notes and references; abstract ≤ 150 words; online supplement ≤ 15 pages). Manuscripts are double spaced with the word count indicated and anonymized for triple-blind review. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
    1k repo stars
50. ▌
    Ylj Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) via its own online author portal — track selection, anonymization, word/length caps, Bluebook readiness, and required materials. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
51. ▌
    Acr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) reviewer reports / an R&R — drafting a point-by-point response letter and 修改说明 that addresses accounting-measure construction, institutional/standard accuracy, identification, and information-mechanism concerns, while keeping the revision anonymous. Use only after the manuscript itself has been revised.
    1k repo stars
52. ▌
    Acr Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which acr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from fit positioning through rebuttal for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
53. ▌
    Acmmm Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging code, models, datasets, or media as ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) artifacts — building the anonymous review package versus the public release, and choosing between the Open Source Software Competition, the Dataset track, the Reproducibility track, and main-track supplementary evidence, each with its own blinding and expectations.
    1k repo stars
54. ▌
    Cre Abstract · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting or revising the 中文摘要 or 英文 abstract for a 《中国农村经济》(China Rural Economy, CRE) manuscript — the CSSCI 权威三农期刊 run by 中国社会科学院农村发展研究所. 当摘要写成"为乡村振兴提供新视角"式套话、缺核心数据 / 识别策略 / 量化发现、或中英文语义不对齐时使用。Enforces the five-sentence pattern, requires quantified household-survey findings (CHIP / CFPS / CLDS / CRRS), and forbids empty-significance phrases.
    1k repo stars
55. ▌
    Cre Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to reviewer reports for a 《中国农村经济》 R&R. Produces the point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits. 本技能服务于《中国农村经济》(China Rural Economy, CRE)。
    1k repo stars
56. ▌
    Cre Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which cre-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《中国农村经济》 (China Rural Economy). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
57. ▌
    Stroke · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Stroke or deciding whether a cerebrovascular-disease study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the clinical/translational/basic cerebrovascular evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, AHA/ASA house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
    1k repo stars
58. ▌
    Crim Research Design · brycewang-stanford

    Use when defending the research design of a Criminology (ASC / Wiley) manuscript — causal identification for quantitative work, longitudinal and life-course designs, criminal-career and trajectory methods, place-based and experimental designs, or case selection and process tracing for qualitative work. Criminology judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
    1k repo stars
59. ▌
    Crim Theory Building · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building the theoretical argument of a Criminology (ASC / Wiley) manuscript into a field-level contribution. Criminology rewards an explicit mechanism, scope conditions, and observable implications over a bare crime correlation, whether the work tests, extends, or adjudicates a criminological theory. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.
    1k repo stars
60. ▌
    Crim Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project fits Criminology (ASC / Wiley) and whether to target a full Article or a Research Note. Criminology is the discipline's interdisciplinary flagship, so the test is a general criminological contribution about the etiology, patterning, or control of crime — not a dataset-specific correlation. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
    1k repo stars
61. ▌
    Demog Research Design · brycewang-stanford

    Use when defending the research design of a Demography (PAA / Duke University Press) manuscript — choosing among demographic methods (life tables, decomposition, event-history/survival, age-period-cohort, multistate, microsimulation, projections) and, where the question is causal, defending identification. Demography judges each method on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
    1k repo stars
62. ▌
    Demog Theory Building · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building the argument of a Demography (PAA / Duke University Press) manuscript into a population-science contribution — whether the work is formal/mathematical demography, an explanatory account of fertility/mortality/migration, or a measurement/decomposition advance. Demography rewards a clear mechanism or a sharpened estimate over a bare correlation. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.
    1k repo stars
63. ▌
    Demog Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project fits Demography (PAA / Duke University Press) and which article type to target. Demography is the multidisciplinary population-science flagship, so the test is general interest to demographers and a genuine population-change question, not just use of demographic data. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
    1k repo stars
64. ▌
    Ecta Identification · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the bottleneck is identification and inference for an Econometrica manuscript — identification conditions and asymptotic distribution theory for an estimator, or axioms and existence/uniqueness for a theory model. Stress-tests the formal foundations before the proofs and simulations are written.
    1k repo stars
65. ▌
    Ecta Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when finalizing the simulation tables and any empirical / illustrative exhibits in an Econometrica manuscript so each is self-contained, precise, and reproducible. Formats and audits exhibits; it does not design the Monte Carlo (use ecta-robustness) or run the estimation.
    1k repo stars
66. ▌
    Interspeech Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when managing an INTERSPEECH project across the annual ISCA cycle — backward-planning from the late-February deadline through the update window, spring review, June notification, camera-ready and registration coupling, and the September–October conference, including what to do in the current post-decision phase and 2027 planning.
    1k repo stars
67. ▌
    Jf Robustness · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning or auditing the robustness, sensitivity, and multiple-testing battery for a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript. Decides which checks are load-bearing; it does not design the main test.
    1k repo stars
68. ▌
    Jf Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for The Journal of Finance (JF) — the AFA online portal, the tiered submission fee, the 60-page limit, the bundled Internet Appendix, code sharing, and disclosure statements.
    1k repo stars
69. ▌
    Jm Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of Marketing (JM) R&R — prioritizing the Coeditor's decisive concerns, strengthening substantive novelty and managerial relevance, and keeping the double-anonymized rules. Plans and drafts the response; it does not interpret the original decision (jm-review-process).
    1k repo stars
70. ▌
    Jm Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which jm-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
71. ▌
    Jop Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing the response to a The Journal of Politics (JOP) revise-and-resubmit. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor, stay within JOP's page budget, keep the manuscript double-blind, and preserve replicability so the eventual JOP replication-analyst check passes. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
    1k repo stars
72. ▌
    Jop Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use as the entry point for any The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript. Routes to the right JOP sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether a Research Article (<= 35 pages) or a Short Article (<= 10 pages) fits. JOP counts pages, not words, and makes acceptance contingent on replicability. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
73. ▌
    Jos Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    当你要把投向《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的全过程从选题到见刊统筹起来时使用。覆盖从选题定位、中文写作与实验、在线投稿、初审→外审→复审→主编终审的多轮修回、录用后定稿清样直到见刊的完整时间线，说明每一步该调用本包哪个技能、如何倒排计划、如何规避专刊截稿与超期等时序陷阱，帮助你把《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 一次投稿的完整生命周期统筹到位，不遗漏关键环节。
    1k repo stars
74. ▌
    Mgsci Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use when choosing and defending the method for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — selecting an analytical modeling approach (optimization, stochastic, game/economic theory) or an empirical design (econometric identification, lab/field experiment, structural, data science) that matches the question and the Department's standards. It designs; it does not execute the analysis (mgsci-data-analysis).
    1k repo stars
75. ▌
    Mind Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford

    Use when positioning a Mind article against the existing philosophical literature so the thesis reads as a genuine move in a live debate. Mind readers are expert across analytic philosophy, so the paper must engage the canonical and current statements of the view it targets, not a strawman. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature section for you.
    1k repo stars
76. ▌
    Mind Objections And Replies · brycewang-stanford

    Use when stress-testing a Mind argument by raising the strongest objections and constructing replies. At a top analytic-philosophy journal, anticipating and answering the best objection is much of the contribution — referees are expert and will supply the objection if you do not. Builds the dialectic; it does not invent positions to knock down.
    1k repo stars
77. ▌
    Misq Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running and reporting the empirical core of a MIS Quarterly manuscript — measurement and structural models (PLS/CB-SEM) for behavioral IS, causal identification and robustness for economics-of-IS, artifact evaluation for design science, or trustworthiness for qualitative IS — and assembling the genre-appropriate transparency materials. Executes/reports the analysis; it does not design the study (misq-methods) or frame the contribution (misq-contribution-framing).
    1k repo stars
78. ▌
    Misq Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when polishing the prose of a MIS Quarterly manuscript — front-loading the IS contribution, writing for an interdisciplinary IS audience that spans four traditions, applying APA 7th / MISQ Style Guide conventions (including MISQ's lead-with-the-information in-text citation style, heading format, and 5–10 keywords), and keeping the manuscript inside its page limit. Late-stage polish; do not invoke while the contribution is unsettled.
    1k repo stars
79. ▌
    Ngeo Scope Fit · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether an Earth-science result clears Nature Geoscience's broad-interest, cross-disciplinary Earth-system gate, or whether it belongs in a community journal such as JGR, GRL, or Communications Earth & Environment. Diagnoses venue fit; does not write or frame the result.
    1k repo stars
80. ▌
    Ors Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to an Operations Research (OR) decision letter — writing the point-by-point response, closing proof gaps, adding baselines/instances, and passing the ORJournal code/data reproducibility review across a revision cycle. Drafts the revision and response; it does not parse the decision in the first place (ors-review-process) or run the final preflight (ors-submission).
    1k repo stars
81. ▌
    Ors Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use as the router for an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — given where you are in the OR/MS modeling-to-submission lifecycle, it names the next ors-* skill to invoke. Routes; it does not itself formulate models (ors-theory-development), prove results (ors-methods), or run computational studies (ors-data-analysis).
    1k repo stars
82. ▌
    Rof Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running a Review of Finance submission preflight for Editorial Express, regular versus Fast-Track fee choice, 60-page cap, 150-word abstract, double-blind anonymity, Chicago references, cover-letter disclosure, and code-sharing exceptions.
    1k repo stars
83. ▌
    Siggraph Review Process · brycewang-stanford

    Use to model the SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers review pipeline and calibrate expectations, covering the single 6-point score scale, the primary/secondary/tertiary reviewer structure, the 1000-word rebuttal, the Technical Papers Committee meeting, conditional acceptance with second-stage verification, and the dual-track Journal-vs-Conference decision.
    1k repo stars
84. ▌
    Sigmetrics Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ACM SIGMETRICS submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the choice among the three rolling deadlines (summer/fall/winter), the separate abstract-registration step, the 20-page single-column acmsmall budget plus unlimited references, double-anonymous review (and the Operational Systems Track exception), track selection, POMACS publication, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.
    1k repo stars
85. ▌
    Sf Research Design · brycewang-stanford

    Use when defending the research design of a Social Forces (SF) manuscript — causal identification for quantitative work, formal demographic design, case selection and process tracing for comparative-historical and ethnographic work, network and computational designs. SF's reputation rests on methodological rigor. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
    1k repo stars
86. ▌
    Sf Theory Building · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building the theoretical argument of a Social Forces (SF) manuscript into a portable, general-audience contribution — whether the work is quantitative, demographic, comparative-historical, ethnographic, network, or computational. SF prizes a theoretically grounded result over a bare finding. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.
    1k repo stars
87. ▌
    Sf Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a project fits Social Forces (SF) and how to frame it. SF is a general social-science journal (centered on sociology) that prizes methodological rigor and a theoretically grounded contribution of interest to a broad audience. Helps frame the question and judge fit; it does not collect data.
    1k repo stars
88. ▌
    Wp Review Process · brycewang-stanford

    Use to understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision, at least two non-Princeton reviewers and often an editor, a roughly four-month decision target, scope screening, and the APSA human-subjects requirement. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
    1k repo stars
89. ▌
    Wp Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building tables and figures for a World Politics manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and placed correctly relative to the word limit. At World Politics tables, figures, and appendixes are excluded from the 12,500-word count, but online supplementary material is capped at fifteen pages, so exhibits must still earn their place. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
    1k repo stars
90. ▌
    Acr Mechanism · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the mechanism analysis for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript is missing or mis-specified — the channel must be an information mechanism (reduce information asymmetry, raise disclosure quality, constrain earnings management, improve audit assurance), not a generic pricing or financing channel. Use after the main result holds.
    1k repo stars
91. ▌
    Advmat Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing figures for an Advanced Materials manuscript, including the lead figure, multi-panel characterization figures, and the Table-of-Contents graphic, where visual quality is a house expectation. Designs figure strategy; does not run the analysis or write prose.
    1k repo stars
92. ▌
    Advmat Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding what characterization and experimental detail an Advanced Materials manuscript must show to prove its structure–property claim, and what belongs in the Experimental Section and Supporting Information. Partitions and stress-tests methods; does not design figures or run analysis.
    1k repo stars
93. ▌
    Asplos Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing an ASPLOS artifact for the post-acceptance evaluation committee — writing the ae.tex Artifact Appendix with software/hardware/dataset dependencies, targeting the Available / Functional / Reproducible badges, archiving on a public repository, and planning the collaborative back-and-forth with evaluators.
    1k repo stars
94. ▌
    Cre Mechanism · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or writing mechanism analyses for a 《中国农村经济》 empirical manuscript. Mechanism tests grounded in household-level behavior are near-mandatory for empirical submissions. 本技能服务于《中国农村经济》(China Rural Economy, CRE)。
    1k repo stars
95. ▌
    Conext Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when converting an accepted ACM CoNEXT paper's package into optional ACM reproducibility badges via the CoNEXT reproducibility committee — from the badge opt-in due before submission, to the one-page artifact description due within a week of acceptance, to the Available / Functional / Reusable / Reproduced criteria and evaluator-proof reuse docs.
    1k repo stars
96. ▌
    CI Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting or polishing the prose of a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay so it meets the journal's bar for ambitious, lucid critical writing and fits the word limit (articles ≤ 9,500 words including discursive notes and all bibliographical information; Critical Responses ≤ 3,000; Reviews ≤ 500). Tightens style and discipline; it does not invent argument or evidence.
    1k repo stars
97. ▌
    Ecta Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when judging whether a result is general, deep, and method-driven enough to belong in Econometrica, and when sharpening the contribution statement. Diagnoses fit and frames the contribution — it does not write proofs (use ecta-theory-model) or position against the literature (use ecta-literature-positioning).
    1k repo stars
98. ▌
    Ecopol Robustness · brycewang-stanford

    Use when an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript's results may be specification-, sample-, or inference-fragile, especially ahead of the two-discussant panel. Organizes robustness by the threat a discussant will raise; it does not invent evidence or citations.
    1k repo stars
99. ▌
    Ecopol Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final preflight for an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript — the commissioning route, the conference-ready draft, and the camera-ready version (not an open submission portal). Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
100. ▌
     Ethics · brycewang-stanford

     Use when targeting Ethics or deciding whether a moral, political, or legal philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit across theoretical and applied moral philosophy, the normative-argument and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
     1k repo stars