← all publishers

brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

Report this profile Claim this profile

• 5.3k skills
• 0 followers
• 1k repo stars
• 2 weeks ago last updated

1. ▌
   Imc Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

   Use when deciding whether an empirical networking project belongs at ACM IMC or should be routed to SIGCOMM, NSDI, CoNEXT, PAM, USENIX Security, WWW, or a journal, using the measurement-first test, the dataset/vantage-point lens, the ethics-gate check, and the two-deadline calendar.
   1k repo stars
2. ▌
   Ipsn Supplementary · brycewang-stanford

   Use when deciding what belongs in an IPSN-lineage paper body versus its artifact, appendix, and demo/poster track, covering the ≤12-page ACM two-column budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-blind supplementary material, dataset release, and how to split a sensor-systems paper between body and package.
   1k repo stars
3. ▌
   Ipsn Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

   Use when revising an IPSN-lineage paper for a real sensing problem on the first page, a load-bearing information-processing or platform contribution, ground-truth methodology, energy/latency/accuracy budgets, honest deployment reporting, double-blind wording, and disciplined use of the ≤12-page ACM two-column budget.
   1k repo stars
4. ▌
   Iros Supplementary · brycewang-stanford

   Use when preparing the IROS video attachment as evidence — the 60-second/10 MB limit, its own deadline, storyboarding uncut real trials and labeled failures, showing playback speed honestly, anonymizing footage under the double-anonymous cycle, and compensating for the fact that IROS provides no supplementary PDF.
   1k repo stars
5. ▌
   Iros Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

   Use when revising an IROS paper for a task-first opening, an integrated-system narrative, the references-counted-in page budget with no supplementary PDF, double-anonymous wording, demo-speak-to-numbers rewrites, and figure-first structure that carries the argument in the body for embodied-systems reviewers.
   1k repo stars
6. ▌
   Isca Supplementary · brycewang-stanford

   Use when deciding what accompanies an ISCA submission beyond the 11 reviewed pages — what must live inside the page budget because reviewers see nothing else, how to use fully anonymized artifact links under the double-blind rules, staging material for the revision window, and planning post-acceptance release.
   1k repo stars
7. ▌
   Isca Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

   Use when drafting or revising an ISCA paper's prose — organizing 11 pages around one architectural insight, writing the motivation section from measured data, describing mechanisms at reviewer-checkable precision with figures that carry the design, and keeping quantitative claims calibrated to the instrument behind them.
   1k repo stars
8. ▌
   Issta Experiments · brycewang-stanford

   Use when designing or auditing ISSTA experiments, covering real subject programs and benchmarks like Defects4J, fair tool-baseline configuration, bug-finding and coverage metrics, non-parametric comparison with effect sizes, equal-budget protocols, repeated runs, and matching evidence to the claim being made.
   1k repo stars
9. ▌
   Itcs Supplementary · brycewang-stanford

   Use when splitting an ITCS paper's content between the body, the appendix, and the arXiv/ECCC/ePrint full version — deciding by what a reviewer must verify, so no central proof lives only in a preprint the PC is not obligated to read, while keeping the first-10-pages merits window clean.
   1k repo stars
10. ▌
    Itcs Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting or revising an ITCS paper's abstract, introduction, and technical presentation so the conceptual innovation lands before any theorem, the model is motivated as a lens rather than a tweak, scope and limitations are owned up front, and complete proofs are deferred cleanly — matching the ITCS emphasis on new ideas over technical depth.
    1k repo stars
11. ▌
    Jama Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when tightening prose and removing spin from a JAMA manuscript to match the journal's clinical house style and the AMA Manual of Style. Polishes language and framing; it does NOT change the analysis or the reported numbers.
    1k repo stars
12. ▌
    Kdd Author Response · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting KDD rebuttals on OpenReview, where authors answer each review under a no-hyperlink rule, cannot upload revisions, and write for the area chair who recommends Accept, Reject, or Resubmit. Covers evidence-anchoring without links, per-reviewer triage, and turning a likely Resubmit into next-cycle material at ACM SIGKDD.
    1k repo stars
13. ▌
    Kdd Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford

    Use when hardening the reproducibility story of a KDD paper, where reproducibility is an explicit decision factor for area chairs. Covers claim-to-evidence tiers for mining pipelines, seeds and splits on large graphs and streams, baseline-tuning disclosure, compute reporting, and honest limits for ADS deployment results.
    1k repo stars
14. ▌
    Atc Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — matching evidence to the claim with real testbeds, fair baselines, end-to-end plus microbenchmark results, tail-latency and variance reporting, workload realism, and honest cost accounting.
    1k repo stars
15. ▌
    Cav Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) empirical evaluation, covering standard benchmark sets (SV-COMP/SMT-COMP/HWMCC/VNN-COMP), fair baseline solvers with pinned versions and equal resource limits, timeout-dominated comparisons, soundness cross-checks and proof witnesses, cactus/scatter reporting, and matching evidence to the shape of each verification claim.
    1k repo stars
16. ▌
    Chi Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing the studies behind an ACM CHI paper — matching evidence shape to contribution type, powering quantitative experiments, making qualitative work rigorous and auditable, reporting participants and ethics properly, and avoiding the ADR-Data and ADR-Method screening grounds.
    1k repo stars
17. ▌
    Dac Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering standard EDA benchmark suites (ISPD, EPFL, ISCAS/ITC, TAU, CircuitNet, OpenROAD flows), fair state-of-the-art baselines, QoR/PPA reporting with runtime, per-benchmark honesty, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and contamination-aware ML-for-EDA evaluation.
    1k repo stars
18. ▌
    Fse Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing ESEC/FSE empirical evaluations, covering real subject systems, fair baselines, SE-standard statistics and effect sizes, qualitative and mixed-methods rigor, contamination-aware LLM ablations, provenance for mining studies, and matching evidence to the shape of each software-engineering claim.
    1k repo stars
19. ▌
    Hri Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing the human-subjects study at the heart of an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — choosing between/within-subjects designs, running Wizard-of-Oz honestly, powering the sample, reporting statistics with effect sizes and qualitative rigor, selecting validated scales, adding manipulation checks, pre-registering, and meeting HRI's human-participants ethics obligations.
    1k repo stars
20. ▌
    Imc Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing ACM IMC measurements, covering representative vantage points, honest ground truth, longitudinal design for a moving Internet, safe and ethical active measurement, coverage-bias quantification, provenance pinning, and matching the measurement to the shape of each claim about the real Internet.
    1k repo stars
21. ▌
    Jama Scope Fit · brycewang-stanford

    Use when judging whether a clinical study clears JAMA's general-medical-importance bar before investing in a full submission. Assesses fit and article-type match; it does NOT design the study or write the paper.
    1k repo stars
22. ▌
    Kdd Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing the empirical section of a KDD paper, where evidence combines quality deltas with scalability and efficiency measurements, temporal-leakage-safe splits, mechanism-isolating ablations, tuning-symmetric baselines, and, for the ADS track, post-launch measurement design that survives the desk check.
    1k repo stars
23. ▌
    Nejm Reporting · brycewang-stanford

    Use to select and enforce the correct EQUATOR reporting guideline for a clinical study headed to NEJM — CONSORT for RCTs (with the participant flow diagram), STROBE for observational, PRISMA for systematic reviews — and to build the required checklist and diagram before submission.
    1k repo stars
24. ▌
    Sci Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use to finalize Science display items — panel/word budget, column-width sizing, minimum font sizes, color-accessibility, and showing the data (points over bars). Enforces figure rigor before submission.
    1k repo stars
25. ▌
    Sci Framing · brycewang-stanford

    Use when locking the conceptual advance and the "why now" before drafting for Science (AAAS) — converts a correct result into a Science-shaped narrative that leads with the broad advance rather than the background, and seeds the title, abstract, and cover letter.
    1k repo stars
26. ▌
    Sci Writing · brycewang-stanford

    Use when choosing the Science (AAAS) format (Research Article vs Report) and holding its length and structure budgets — main-text word caps, figure caps, argument-ordered Results, and deciding what belongs in the main text versus Supplementary Materials.
    1k repo stars
27. ▌
    Uai Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing UAI experiments where inference quality is the endpoint, covering calibration and coverage measurement, posterior diagnostics, structure-recovery metrics for causal and graphical models, seeded repeated runs, baselines from both sampling and optimization families, and mapping each claim to its evidence.
    1k repo stars
28. ▌
    Vis Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing IEEE VIS evaluations, covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study, controlled user study, algorithm benchmark, design-study validation, qualitative work), controlled experiment design with power and effect sizes, CVD-safe and perceptually grounded encoding choices, task taxonomies, and provenance so a TVCG reviewer trusts the result.
    1k repo stars
29. ▌
    Aaai Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.
    1k repo stars
30. ▌
    Aamas Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an AAMAS project timeline from venue fit through abstract, full-paper or extended-abstract upload, supplementary material, the double-blind rebuttal, decision, IFAAMAS camera-ready, registration, and presentation, with track-specific deadlines and backward-planning offsets for a game-theory-plus-experiments paper.
    1k repo stars
31. ▌
    Acl Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode logistics.
    1k repo stars
32. ▌
    Acl Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when positioning an ACL submission against the NLP literature, covering ACL Anthology citation practice, arXiv-versus-published version citation, concurrent LLM-era preprints, prior-cycle ARR resubmission overlap, anonymity-preserving self-citation, and the fast-moving baseline problem in computational linguistics.
    1k repo stars
33. ▌
    Ccs Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an ACM CCS project timeline across the two HotCRP review cycles, from venue fit through abstract registration, full-paper upload, rebuttal, notification, revision, artifact evaluation, ACM camera-ready, and in-person presentation, with backward-planning offsets and the security big-four deadline-hopping calendar.
    1k repo stars
34. ▌
    Ase Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing the ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) camera-ready after acceptance or a successful revision, covering systematic de-anonymization, the extra content page, the mandatory Data Availability finalization, the correct IEEE/ACM template and metadata, permanentized artifact links, and dual IEEE-Xplore/ACM-DL production checks.
    1k repo stars
35. ▌
    Ase Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing the related-work and positioning of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper, covering the automated-SE literature lanes, delta-first positioning against prior tools/techniques, fair head-to-head framing, and double-anonymous self-citation.
    1k repo stars
36. ▌
    Atc Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) camera-ready after a conditional accept — de-anonymizing systematically, folding in the shepherd's required revisions, permanentizing artifact links, completing ACM Open Access metadata and the transition APC, and passing production checks for the November Hong Kong proceedings.
    1k repo stars
37. ▌
    Atc Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — covering the systems literature lanes, positioning against OSDI/SOSP/NSDI/EuroSys/FAST, writing delta-first comparisons, and keeping self-citation double-blind.
    1k repo stars
38. ▌
    Cav Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing an accepted CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for its Springer LNCS open-access camera-ready, covering de-anonymization for the previously double-blind categories, the LNCS llncs template and Springer metadata (ORCID, author order, running heads), the copyright/open-access forms, integrating reviewer-required changes without scope creep, permanentizing artifact links, and the AEC badge handoff.
    1k repo stars
39. ▌
    Cav Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when positioning a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission against the verification literature across CAV, TACAS, FMCAD, VMCAI, POPL/PLDI, and the journals (FMSD, JAR, TOCL, STTT), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, crediting the right benchmark and tool lineages, keeping self-citations double-anonymous for the anonymized categories, and handling concurrent and prior-version overlap.
    1k repo stars
40. ▌
    Cell Highlights · brycewang-stanford

    Use to produce the three signature Cell front-matter artifacts — Highlights (3–4 bullets, each ≤85 characters), the eTOC/In Brief blurb (~50 words, third-person), and the Graphical Abstract (single-panel visual summary). Late-stage polish.
    1k repo stars
41. ▌
    Cell Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use as the final preflight before submitting to Cell — a complete checklist across significance, narrative, Highlights/eTOC/Graphical Abstract, Summary, figures, STAR Methods, data, references, and required files. Bundles the checklist and cover-letter templates.
    1k repo stars
42. ▌
    Chi Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing an accepted ACM CHI paper for publication — the TAPS source upload, the PCS publication-ready package, mandatory accessibility work (alt text, screen-reader-friendly PDFs, table headers), video previews, ACM's open-access model, e-rights, and registration deadlines.
    1k repo stars
43. ▌
    Chi Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building the related-work section of an ACM CHI paper — covering the HCI venue family and the non-CS disciplines CHI draws on, positioning against the last few CHI cycles, keeping self-citation anonymous — in a venue where insufficient contextualization is the top assisted desk-reject ground.
    1k repo stars
44. ▌
    Cikm Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing a CIKM submission for EasyChair readiness across the five tracks, covering page budgets with appendices counted inside, the mandatory GenAI Usage Disclosure section, author-reviewer nomination, double-blind rules with arXiv declaration, the abstract-gate authorship freeze, and desk-reject triggers.
    1k repo stars
45. ▌
    Colm Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing or auditing a COLM submission on OpenReview — the late-March abstract and full-paper deadlines, the strict 9-page main text, double-blind rules banning acknowledgments and identity links, the Code of Ethics acknowledgment, LLM-usage disclosure, reciprocal-reviewer nomination, and pre-upload risk triage.
    1k repo stars
46. ▌
    Colt Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) submission for CMT readiness, the 12-page PMLR-format main body, single-PDF assembly with unlimited appendix, double-anonymous formatting, the parallel-submission ban covering journals and proceedings venues, and the ordered final-week checks before the AoE deadline.
    1k repo stars
47. ▌
    Corl Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing or auditing a CoRL OpenReview submission — the corl_2026 LaTeX template, the 8-page main text with a mandatory Limitations section counted inside it, uncounted references and appendix, the supplementary file and 250 MB video, double-anonymous rules, abstract registration, and dual-submission checks.
    1k repo stars
48. ▌
    Cscw Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when readying a CSCW manuscript for upload — confirming the current pathway (rolling via Manuscript Central as of mid-2026), the single-column ACM template, the word-length scrutiny band, anonymization of author and community identifiers, ethics statements, and desk-risk triage.
    1k repo stars
49. ▌
    Cvpr Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing a CVPR submission before the OpenReview deadline, covering abstract registration and profile requirements, the 8-page limit including figures and tables, the Compute Reporting Form, anonymity and external-link bans, dual-submission attestations, reviewer-duty enrollment, and desk-reject triage.
    1k repo stars
50. ▌
    Dac Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing the final ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research-Manuscript camera-ready after acceptance, covering de-anonymization, restoring author/affiliation/acknowledgement/funding blocks, the ACM copyright form and rights stamp, the April proceedings deadline, ACM Digital Library metadata and archival-flow checks, and the still-fixed 6+1 page budget.
    1k repo stars
51. ▌
    Dac Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering the EDA literature lanes (DAC/ICCAD/DATE/ASP-DAC/TCAD/TODAES), delta-first positioning against the strongest prior tool, honest benchmark-suite lineage, and third-person self-citation under double-blind review within the six-page budget.
    1k repo stars
52. ▌
    Eacl Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an EACL submission before its single ACL Rolling Review cycle deadline, covering ACL-template compliance, the 8-page long / 4-page short content caps, the mandatory Limitations section, the Responsible NLP checklist, anonymization, preprint and resubmission declarations, and the no-fallback-cycle timing trap.
    1k repo stars
53. ▌
    Ecai Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ECAI submission for readiness — the abstract-then-full-paper two-deadline flow, the tight 7-page body budget, double-blind anonymity, the correct template/publisher regime (ecai.cls/FAIA for a standalone ECAI vs ijcai.sty/IJCAI proceedings for the joint IJCAI-ECAI 2026), the per-author submission cap, the ethics statement, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.
    1k repo stars
54. ▌
    Eccv Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ECCV submission for the two-step registration-then-paper deadline chain, the 14-page LNCS single-column limit, CET (not AoE) cutoffs, the trailing supplementary deadline, double-blind rules, the four-page dual-submission definition, the social-media embargo, and reviewer-duty exposure before upload.
    1k repo stars
55. ▌
    Edbt Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an EDBT research-track submission for Microsoft CMT readiness, covering the cycle choice, the paper shape (Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis / Vision), the OpenProceedings/host LaTeX template and per-shape page budget, the 12-month resubmission ban, reproducibility items, and desk-reject triage before the cycle deadline.
    1k repo stars
56. ▌
    Emnlp Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an EMNLP project calendar end to end — choosing the ACL Rolling Review cycle that feeds the conference, backward-planning experiments and annotation to the ARR deadline, scheduling the author response window, deciding commit versus revise-and-resubmit, and mapping camera-ready and Budapest presentation logistics.
    1k repo stars
57. ▌
    Facct Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an ACM FAccT project timeline from venue fit through abstract registration, OpenReview submission, the rebuttal window, the new Accept/Revise/Reject revise-and-resubmit round, two-round camera-ready, and in-person presentation, with backward-planning offsets for an interdisciplinary responsible-AI paper and honest handling of the single annual deadline.
    1k repo stars
58. ▌
    Fast Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing a USENIX FAST submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the choice between the Spring and Fall deadlines, abstract registration, the USENIX two-column template and 12-page (long) / 6-page (short) limit excluding references, double-blind anonymization, the artifact-availability story, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.
    1k repo stars
59. ▌
    Focs Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-upload audit of a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) submission — the April HotCRP deadline clock, the abstract-references-plus-ten-pages attention rule, the 11-point single-column format floor, PDF security restrictions, double-blind checks, and SIGACT publication-policy compliance.
    1k repo stars
60. ▌
    Fse Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing an accepted ESEC/FSE paper for its PACMSE camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the ACM Primary Article Template and PACMSE journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, CCS concepts), integrating reviewer-required changes without scope creep, permanentizing the Data Availability links, and the ACM artifact-badge handoff.
    1k repo stars
61. ▌
    Fse Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when positioning an ESEC/FSE submission against the software-engineering literature across ICSE, FSE, ASE, ISSTA, MSR, and the SE journals (EMSE, TSE, TOSEM), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-anonymous, and handling concurrent, preprint, and prior-version overlap.
    1k repo stars
62. ▌
    Hpca Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an HPCA submission for the two-step July gate on HotCRP, the 11-page main-body limit, the IEEE template, double-blind anonymity plus the all-authors reference rule, the AI-use disclosure, artifact-link scrubbing, and final-week sequencing before the paper deadline.
    1k repo stars
63. ▌
    Hri Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing the camera-ready of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — de-anonymizing systematically, completing ACM+IEEE dual-publication metadata (CCS concepts, ORCID, rights/eRights form), delivering every rebuttal promise within the 8-page budget, finalizing the video and de-anonymized archive, and passing production checks.
    1k repo stars
64. ▌
    Hri Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — covering HRI's crossing literatures (robotics, HCI, psychology, design), writing a delta-first argument that credits each community, and keeping self-citation compatible with double-blind review.
    1k repo stars
65. ▌
    Icalp Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an ICALP (EATCS) campaign backward from its single annual February deadline, through abstract registration, the anonymous submission, the Track B rebuttal window, the April notification, and the LIPIcs camera-ready and presentation, and when coordinating a full-version (arXiv/ECCC) release alongside the anonymous submission.
    1k repo stars
66. ▌
    Iccv Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ICCV submission in the weeks before the early-March deadline, covering OpenReview registration and profile completeness, the single same-day paper-plus-supplement upload, the 8-page inclusive format, the 25-submissions-per-author cap, every-author reviewer enrollment, anonymity and media-embargo rules, and desk-reject triage.
    1k repo stars
67. ▌
    Icde Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an IEEE ICDE research-track submission for round choice, Microsoft CMT setup, conflict declarations, the IEEE 12-page format, single-blind requirements, supplemental-material availability, the June/November two-round calendar, desk-reject triggers, and final-week sequencing for a data-engineering systems paper.
    1k repo stars
68. ▌
    Icdm Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) submission for readiness, covering Research-vs-Applied track choice and its anonymity regime, the triple-blind sweep, the 10-page IEEE all-inclusive cap, the single June deadline, in-paper artifact references, and the desk-level triggers that get an ICDM paper rejected without review.
    1k repo stars
69. ▌
    Icdt Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) regular-paper submission for Microsoft CMT readiness, covering the two-step abstract-then-paper deadline in the correct submission cycle, the lipics-v2021 15-page limit excluding references, the clearly-marked appendix read at the PC's discretion, anonymous submission since 2024, the complete-proofs / full-version expectation, and which submission problems are unfixable after the AoE cutoff.
    1k repo stars
70. ▌
    Iclr Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ICLR main-conference submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reciprocal reviewing, LLM-use disclosure, dual-submission policy, supplementary material, and desk-reject risk.
    1k repo stars
71. ▌
    Icml Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ICML main-track submission for OpenReview, LaTeX formatting, 8-page body, anonymity, supplementary material, impact statement, dual submission, concurrent ICML submissions, reciprocal reviewing, and LLM/prompt-injection policy compliance.
    1k repo stars
72. ▌
    Icra Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ICRA paper for upload — PaperPlaza account and metadata, the 6-page-plus-2-reference-page limit, IEEE two-column template compliance, the double-anonymous rule introduced in the 2026 cycle, video-attachment specs (180 s, 20 MB), dual-submission conflicts with RA-L, and return-without-review triggers.
    1k repo stars
73. ▌
    Icse Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ICSE research-track submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the mandatory abstract deadline, the 10-page-plus-2-reference-page IEEE format, double-anonymous rules, the open-science Data Availability section, supplementary uploads, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.
    1k repo stars
74. ▌
    Icsme Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an IEEE ICSME project timeline from venue and track choice through abstract registration, paper submission, the early-decision cut and author-response rebuttal, notification, IEEE Xplore camera-ready, the ROSE-Festival artifact evaluation, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets for a maintenance/evolution paper and honest handling of the single-annual-round calendar.
    1k repo stars
75. ▌
    Ijcai Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI project timeline from venue fit through abstract registration, full-paper upload, author information, PPI payment, summary-reject risk, author response, notification, camera-ready, in-person presentation, and artifact release.
    1k repo stars
76. ▌
    Imc Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing an accepted ACM IMC paper for the proceedings, covering systematic de-anonymization, finalizing the Ethics and artifact-availability statements, permanentizing dataset and code links to DOI-issuing archives, satisfying the availability shepherd, Community Contribution Award eligibility, and ACM production checks.
    1k repo stars
77. ▌
    Imc Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM IMC paper, covering the measurement literature lanes, positioning against prior datasets and vantage points, delta-first framing, citing the datasets and tools you build on, distinguishing IMC from SIGCOMM/NSDI/PAM prior art, and keeping self-citations double-blind.
    1k repo stars
78. ▌
    Ipsn Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an IPSN-lineage submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the IP-vs-SPOTS track choice, the ACM Primary Article Template and ≤12-page inclusive budget, the double-blind sweep for hardware/deployment papers, dataset/artifact links, and desk-reject triage — routed to the current successor (SenSys) call because IPSN no longer runs standalone.
    1k repo stars
79. ▌
    Iros Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an IROS paper for the PaperPlaza upload — author PINs and metadata, the content-page limit with references counted in, IEEE two-column format, the 2026 double-anonymous rule, the 60-second/10 MB video attachment and its own deadline, dual-submission traps shared with ICRA and RA-L, and return-without-review triggers.
    1k repo stars
80. ▌
    Isca Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-deadline audit of an ISCA submission — the two-step abstract-then-paper gate a week apart, the 11-page text limit with unlimited references, the template check, the double-blind sweep including PDF metadata and anonymized artifact links, and HotCRP form completion before AoE.
    1k repo stars
81. ▌
    Issta Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an ISSTA project timeline from venue fit through the January research-paper deadline, the March author response, the April first decision, the May Major-Revision sprint, the June final decision, artifact evaluation, and the October symposium, with backward-planning offsets for a testing/analysis tool paper and its artifact.
    1k repo stars
82. ▌
    Itcs Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing an ITCS submission for HotCRP readiness — the early-September abstract-then-paper deadlines, single-column >= 11pt format with no hard page limit, the first-10-pages merits window, complete proofs of all central claims, the lightweight double-blind sweep, and the archival-prior-publication check.
    1k repo stars
83. ▌
    Jama Statistics · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing or auditing the statistical analysis and reporting of a JAMA manuscript so it survives JAMA's dedicated statistical review. Enforces effect sizes with 95% CIs, multiplicity control, and pre-specification; it does NOT choose the study design or write prose.
    1k repo stars
84. ▌
    Jama Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a JAMA manuscript — word/format limits, required statements, checklist and flow-diagram files, disclosures, and portal steps. Verifies completeness; it does NOT write or analyze content.
    1k repo stars
85. ▌
    Kdd Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when preparing an accepted KDD paper for ACM proceedings, covering the 12-page proceedings budget with 9 content pages, the extra content page over the submission, the 3-page cap on references plus appendix, ACM e-rights and TAPS source processing, ACM Open APC status, de-anonymization, and Digital Library metadata for SIGKDD.
    1k repo stars
86. ▌
    Kdd Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when positioning a KDD submission against the data-mining lineage (prior KDD volumes, ICDM, SDM, WSDM, CIKM, WWW) and the ML flagships, handling venue misattribution traps, cross-cycle resubmission overlap, concurrent arXiv work, and the mechanism-contrast style of novelty argument that ACM SIGKDD reviewers expect.
    1k repo stars
87. ▌
    Lancet Ethics · brycewang-stanford

    Use to satisfy The Lancet's clinical-ethics and research-integrity requirements — ethics-committee approval and informed consent under the Declaration of Helsinki, the Declaration of interests, ICMJE author contributions, the role-of-the-funding-source statement, the data-sharing statement, patient and public involvement, and SAGER sex/gender plus equity reporting.
    1k repo stars
88. ▌
    Micro Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning a MICRO campaign end to end — the April-to-Athens 2026 cycle clock, the four-venue architecture calendar (MICRO/ISCA/HPCA/ASPLOS) seen from MICRO's October seat, resubmission lattices after each outcome, and starting the MICRO 2027 evaluation stack early enough to matter.
    1k repo stars
89. ▌
    Mind Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Mind via ScholarOne — preparation for triple-anonymous review, the ~8,000-word limit, the 50–200-word abstract, line numbering, the one-article-per-12-months rule, file format, and the MIND house style. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
90. ▌
    Mlsys Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning an MLSys submission cycle end to end, from venue-fit and track choice through evaluation freeze, the October deadline, the four-day January response, notification, camera-ready, the March artifact-evaluation submission, and the May conference, with backward planning built around scarce GPU time and team ownership.
    1k repo stars
91. ▌
    Naacl Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning a research project's calendar toward NAACL — handling the chapter's skipped-year rhythm, choosing an ARR cycle when the edition's feeding cycles are not yet announced, backward-planning data and annotation work, and keeping a decision tree for commit-versus-wait-versus-reroute moments.
    1k repo stars
92. ▌
    Ndss Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when performing the final pre-upload audit of an NDSS submission — HotCRP fields, the AoE deadline, NDSS template and 13-page compliance, double-blind sweep, ethics readiness, the six-per-author cap, overlap rules, and desk-reject triage in the last week.
    1k repo stars
93. ▌
    Nejm Statistics · brycewang-stanford

    Use to enforce NEJM's clinical statistical reporting — confidence intervals over bare P values, the pre-specified intention-to-treat primary analysis, multiplicity control for secondary endpoints, pre-specified subgroups with interaction tests, missing-data handling, and absolute risk with NNT alongside relative measures.
    1k repo stars
94. ▌
    Nejm Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use as the final preflight before submitting to NEJM — a complete clinical checklist across significance, registration, reporting guidelines, abstract, statistics, display items, ethics, references, and required files. Bundles a checklist and a clinical cover-letter template.
    1k repo stars
95. ▌
    Nsdi Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-upload audit of an NSDI submission — the abstract-then-paper week on the per-deadline HotCRP site, 11:59 pm US Eastern cutoffs, the 12-page cap with references and appendices outside it, track-dependent anonymization, the eight-paper author cap, and the resubmission-ban check.
    1k repo stars
96. ▌
    Osdi Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-upload audit of an OSDI submission on HotCRP — the December registration and full-paper deadlines at 2:59 pm PST, the 12-page/no-appendix check, institution-level double-blind rules, the renamed-system requirement, track choice, and the eight-submission author cap.
    1k repo stars
97. ▌
    Pldi Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when auditing a PLDI submission for HotCRP readiness — the single annual November deadline, the 20-pages-of-text-excluding-bibliography cap in single-column acmsmall format, double-blind hygiene across tool names and repositories, dual-submission rules, and summary-rejection triggers before the cutoff.
    1k repo stars
98. ▌
    Pmla Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) via the ScholarOne site — venue selection, MLA-membership eligibility, anonymous preparation, word range, MLA style, cover sheet, and AI-content disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
99. ▌
    Pnas Statistics · brycewang-stanford

    Use to enforce PNAS's statistics and reproducibility reporting — n and replication, test choice and assumptions, effect sizes with uncertainty, multiple-comparison control, randomization/blinding, sample-size justification, pre-registration where relevant, and reproducible code.
    1k repo stars
100. ▌
     Pnas Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

     Use as the final preflight before submitting to PNAS — a complete checklist across significance, track, Significance Statement, abstract, classification + keywords, figures, statistics, data, references, and required files. Bundles a checklist and a PNAS cover-letter template. Emits GO/NO-GO.
     1k repo stars