brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
2 weeks ago last updated

▌
Podc Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing an ACM PODC submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the two-step abstract-registration then full-paper deadline, the ACM Master template with the 10-page-merits budget and unbounded full version, lightweight double-blind anonymization, the regular-paper-vs-Brief-Announcement choice, and desk-risk triage before the AoE cutoff.

1k repo stars
▌
Pods Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing an ACM PODS research submission for EasyChair readiness, covering the chosen cycle's abstract-then-paper deadlines, the acmsmall[review,anonymous] format and 15-page budget, the at-submission proof appendix, lightweight double-anonymity, the declared conflicts of interest, PACMMOD-track publication, and desk-risk triage before the AoE cutoff.

1k repo stars
▌
Popl Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing a POPL submission for the single July HotCRP deadline — auditing the 25-pages-of-text acmsmall cap, summary-rejection format rules, full double-blind hygiene for theory papers with public proof repositories, dual-submission exposure, and the final-days upload order before the AoE cutoff.

1k repo stars
▌
Ppopp Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning a PPoPP submission campaign end to end, sequencing the summer paper deadline, the author-response rebuttal window, notification, the post-acceptance CGO-shared artifact-evaluation round, the camera-ready, and the presentation inside the co-located HPCA/CGO/PPoPP/CC week.

1k repo stars
▌
Sci Abstract · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the two front-matter artifacts Science (AAAS) demands — the one-sentence summary for the table of contents and the ≤125-word single-paragraph abstract — both readable by any scientist and both leading with the quantified advance rather than the method. Late-stage polish skill for the flagship AAAS weekly.

1k repo stars
▌
Sci Citation · brycewang-stanford
Use when converting a reference list to Science (AAAS) numbered style — italic numbers cited in order of appearance, a single continuous list that the Supplementary Materials share, full author lists rather than "et al." in the bibliography, and abbreviated journal titles. Late-stage style pass for the flagship AAAS weekly.

1k repo stars
▌
Sci Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use after Science reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and honest about limits. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.

1k repo stars
▌
Sci Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which sci-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for Science (AAAS). Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Sigir Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning a SIGIR project calendar — backward-planning from the January-pattern abstract/paper deadlines to the July conference, sequencing evidence freeze, significance testing, and anonymization, coordinating multi-track decisions, and wiring the SIGIR/ECIR/CIKM/WSDM/SIGIR-AP fallback calendar into one pipeline.

1k repo stars
▌
Socc Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing an ACM SoCC (Symposium on Cloud Computing) research-paper submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the two-round abstract+paper deadlines, the acmart/sigconf 12-page (full) or 6-page (short) budget with unlimited references, dual-anonymous review, the systems-and-data reproducibility posture, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.

1k repo stars
▌
Soda Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing or auditing a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) submission — the no-page-limit full-version norm, the title-page abstract, 11-point single-column letter format, lightweight double-blind rules, HotCRP entry, and the July AoE deadline with its summary-rejection triggers.

1k repo stars
▌
Sosp Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing a SOSP submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the abstract-registration and full-paper deadlines, the 12-page technical-content limit with references excluded, the 7x9-inch two-column format, double-blind rules with paper-ID substitution, conflict declaration under PC-chair audit, and desk-reject triage.

1k repo stars
▌
Stoc Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) submission for HotCRP readiness — the abstract + table-of-contents + first-12-pages reading rule, single-column 11-point format, double-blind hygiene, the SIGACT prior/simultaneous-publication policy, and deadline-week sequencing before the November cutoff.

1k repo stars
▌
Tacas Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning a TACAS (ETAPS) project timeline from category choice and venue fit through the EasyChair paper deadline, the mandatory tool-paper artifact deadline, the rebuttal window, notification, the voluntary post-acceptance artifact round, LNCS camera-ready, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets that account for TACAS's single annual round and its parallel paper+artifact review.

1k repo stars
▌
Uai Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
Use when converting an accepted UAI paper into its PMLR proceedings version, covering de-anonymization, final formatting against the UAI template, metadata for the PMLR volume, restoring public code and data links, poster and spotlight preparation for the conference, and sequencing work back from the camera-ready deadline.

1k repo stars
▌
Uai Related Work · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a UAI submission within the probabilistic reasoning, graphical-model, causality, and Bayesian ML literature, covering PMLR archival status of recent UAI volumes, double-blind self-citation discipline, concurrent arXiv and workshop versions, and the cross-community citation coverage UAI reviewers check first.

1k repo stars
▌
Uist Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when performing the final pre-upload audit of a UIST paper in PCS — the abstract-then-paper deadline pair, 10-page/5-page two-column limits with desk-reject enforcement, anonymous acmart options, video-figure and supplementary uploads, the prior-work overlap rule, and deadline-week sequencing.

1k repo stars
▌
Vis Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing an accepted IEEE VIS paper for its IEEE TVCG camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the VGTC/TVCG template and journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, IEEE keywords/index terms), integrating the second-round required changes without scope creep, permanentizing open-materials links, the Open Practices disclosure form, and the Graphics Replicability Stamp handoff.

1k repo stars
▌
Vis Related Work · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning an IEEE VIS submission against the visualization literature across TVCG, the six VIS areas, EuroVis/CGF, PacificVis, and adjacent HCI/graphics venues, writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-blind when opted in, and handling concurrent, preprint, and prior-version overlap for a TVCG journal article.

1k repo stars
▌
Vldb Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing a PVLDB submission before a monthly deadline, covering the mandatory abstract on the 25th, the CMT window, the 1st-of-month 5:00 PM Pacific cutoff, category and page-budget choice, single-blind cover-page requirements, the per-month and per-year author caps, and desk-reject hazards specific to VLDB.

1k repo stars
▌
Wacv Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing a WACV submission before an OpenReview round deadline, covering the Round 1 vs Round 2 choice, the Applications vs Algorithms track field, the 8-page-including-figures limit, double-blind anonymity and OpenReview-profile requirements, the anonymized supplement, dual submission, and desk-reject triage.

1k repo stars
▌
Wsdm Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required ethical-considerations section, anonymization that survives Associate-Chair metadata visibility, and desk-reject exposure at a no-rebuttal venue.

1k repo stars
▌
Aaai Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

1k repo stars
▌
Acl Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when organizing appendices and supplementary material for an ACL paper under ACL Rolling Review, covering the mandatory Limitations and optional ethics sections, appendices after references, anonymized software and data archives, the no-cloud-links rule, and deciding what must stay in the 8-page or 4-page body.

1k repo stars
▌
Acl Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising an ACL paper for computational-linguistics house style, covering task-first framing, linguistic examples tied to quantitative error analysis, scoping language claims to tested languages, LLM-era claim discipline, anonymous self-reference, Limitations prose, and compressing into the 8-page or 4-page ACL format.

1k repo stars
▌
Acmmm Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning the end-to-end ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) campaign calendar — from thematic-area scoping and track choice, through the April OpenReview abstract/paper/supplement chain, the June anonymous rebuttal, the July decision, the August camera-ready, and the November presentation in Rio, with the right skill invoked at each stage.

1k repo stars
▌
Ase Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in the 10-page ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper body versus the artifact and supplementary material, splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives outside the reviewed pages under the 10+2 budget.

1k repo stars
▌
Ase Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when shaping the prose and structure of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research paper, covering the automation-first first-page arc, stating the automated task precisely, keeping the tool runnable and the model-swap test in mind, threats-as-argument, and the 10+2 page discipline on the ACM acmart template.

1k repo stars
▌
Atc Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) two-page extended abstract, the 12-page paper body, the optional appendix, and the artifact — splitting content by review round and decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives where a reviewer is not required to read.

1k repo stars
▌
Atc Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.

1k repo stars
▌
Cav Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper body versus its optional appendix and artifact, covering the LNCS page limits, the rule that reviewers are not obliged to read the appendix so decision-critical content stays in the body, where full proofs and benchmark tables live, and double-anonymous supplementary material for the anonymized categories.

1k repo stars
▌
Cav Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.

1k repo stars
▌
Chi Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when assembling supplementary materials for an ACM CHI submission — the video figure with mandatory closed captions, appendices, study instruments, code and data archives — all due with the paper on the single September deadline, anonymized end to end, plus the camera-ready video preview.

1k repo stars
▌
Chi Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.

1k repo stars
▌
Cikm Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the empirical program of a CIKM paper — matching evidence to the claim's lanes across retrieval, mining, and knowledge-management evaluation cultures, choosing datasets and baselines that survive a blended panel, isolating the boundary mechanism, and meeting applied-track deployment-evidence bars.

1k repo stars
▌
Colm Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the empirical core of a COLM paper — contamination analysis for evaluation data, fair baselines under matched prompting and compute, pinned model versions and decoding parameters, uncertainty over runs and samples, scaling coverage, and honest reporting of API-model comparisons.

1k repo stars
▌
Colt Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper needs numerical content at all — COLT has no experiments requirement — and, when numerics genuinely help, designing small illustrative simulations that visualize a proved bound, a separation, or a phase transition without diluting the theory.

1k repo stars
▌
Corl Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing experiments for a CoRL robot-learning paper — seeds and evaluation-episode counts, task-suite breadth, real-robot versus simulation evidence, sim-to-real gap measurement, baseline fairness across BC/RL/VLA families, generalization splits, and statistics for success-rate claims.

1k repo stars
▌
Cscw Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the empirical work behind a CSCW paper — interview and ethnographic rigor, trace and log analysis, surveys, deployments, and mixed methods — matching each method's own validity standard and the ethics of studying real communities.

1k repo stars
▌
Cvpr Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of a CVPR paper, covering benchmark and baseline selection under matched-compute fairness, the ablation study reviewers treat as mandatory, qualitative and failure-case evidence, efficiency metrics tied to the Compute Reporting Form, and generalization tests beyond a single dataset.

1k repo stars
▌
Dac Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs inside the six reviewed pages of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript versus in an external repository, given DAC's tight 6+1 budget, its references-only seventh page, the double-blind constraint on any linked material, and the absence of a formal reviewed-appendix or artifact-badging track.

1k repo stars
▌
Dac Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or tightening the prose of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering the QoR-forward first-page arc, stating the design-automation contribution as a measured delta, fitting a complete argument into six double-column pages plus a references-only page, building column-width EDA figures, and third-person self-citation for double-blind review.

1k repo stars
▌
Eacl Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the empirical evidence for an EACL paper, covering tuned and LLM baselines, multilingual breadth matched to the claim, significance and variance floors, human-evaluation agreement, data-contamination controls, ablations, and error taxonomies, so that every stated result is measured rather than asserted.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecai Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the evidence in an ECAI paper — choosing proof versus experiment by claim shape across ECAI's breadth (theory/KR, planning/search, ML, multi-agent, applied), fair baselines, seeds and spread, honest ablations, and provenance, all supporting a claim inside a 7-page body.

1k repo stars
▌
Eccv Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.

1k repo stars
▌
Edbt Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing EDBT empirical evaluations for database-systems work, covering real workloads and datasets, fair and tuned baselines, honest measurement across realistic scales, reproducible harnesses, and the higher bar of the Experiments & Analysis paper where the measurement itself is the contribution.

1k repo stars
▌
Fast Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing a USENIX FAST storage evaluation, covering real devices and firmware, device-state control (aging, preconditioning, fill, TRIM), standard workloads and traces (SNIA IOTTA, YCSB, filebench, fio), write amplification, tail latency, endurance and wear, crash-consistency testing, fair baselines, and matching the metric to the shape of each storage claim.

1k repo stars
▌
Focs Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether and how computation appears in a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) paper — a venue that accepts on theorems with no evaluation section expected — covering machine-verified case analyses, computer-discovered constructions, and honest illustrative plots.

1k repo stars
▌
Fse Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in an ESEC/FSE paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the ACM-template page budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an empirical-SE paper between body and package.

1k repo stars
▌
Fse Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising an ESEC/FSE paper for a practitioner-grounded software-engineering contribution on the first page, research-question contracts, a threats-to-validity section that argues rather than recites, evidence proportional to the claim, double-anonymous wording, and disciplined use of the ACM-template page budget.

1k repo stars
▌
Hri Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning the supplementary materials for an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — above all the video figure that shows the embodied interaction, plus study instruments, extended results, and appendices — deciding what a reviewer must see to judge the interaction versus what belongs outside the 8-page body, all anonymized for double-blind review.

1k repo stars
▌
Hri Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper's structure and prose for an interdisciplinary audience — leading with the human-robot contribution and research questions, making hypotheses and measures explicit, describing the robot embodiment, keeping claims proportional to the study within the 8-page acmart budget, and writing so the chosen track's contribution type is unmistakable.

1k repo stars
▌
Iccv Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the experimental program for an ICCV paper against the early-March deadline, covering benchmark-drift audits across the two-year gap, baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate mechanisms, qualitative and failure evidence, and sequencing runs so the decisive result lands before the deadline, not after.

1k repo stars
▌
Icdm Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.

1k repo stars
▌
Icdt Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations, and, only for papers with an algorithmic contribution, a proportional and honestly-scoped experimental evaluation that does not pretend to be the contribution.

1k repo stars
▌
Iclr Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing ICLR experiments, including baselines, ablations, scaling laws, robustness, statistics, benchmarks, human evaluation, and compute reporting. Use when a reviewer questions whether a representation-learning or model gain is real, when you must isolate one mechanism with an ablation, or when preparing a small compute-matched control that can be posted inline during the public discussion period.

1k repo stars
▌
Icml Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when stress-testing ICML experimental evidence before submission or rebuttal, including strong tuned baselines, mechanism-isolating ablations, seed variance and confidence intervals, compute disclosure, data leakage and split construction, reproducibility, negative results, and fit to ICML soundness, originality, and significance scoring.

1k repo stars
▌
Icra Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the experimental section of an ICRA paper — real-robot versus simulation-only evidence, trial counts and success-rate reporting, task distributions and resets, baseline fairness on shared hardware, sim-to-real transfer claims, failure-mode analysis, and the statistics robotics reviewers actually expect.

1k repo stars
▌
Icse Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ICSE research-track paper, covering subject and benchmark selection, baseline fairness, statistical tests and effect sizes as SE reviewers expect them, qualitative-methods rigor, ablations for AI-based techniques, and threats-driven study design.

1k repo stars
▌
Imc Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM IMC paper body versus its appendix and released artifact, covering the acmart page limits, the rule that decision-critical evidence and the Ethics discussion stay in the reviewed pages, double-blind supplementary material, and how to split a measurement paper between body, appendix, and dataset.

1k repo stars
▌
Imc Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM IMC measurement paper, covering the first-page measurement finding, making vantage points and methodology auditable, longitudinal framing for a moving Internet, arguing limitations rather than reciting them, writing the Ethics section early, and acmart page-budget discipline.

1k repo stars
▌
Ipsn Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing IPSN-lineage evaluations, covering real testbeds and deployments, ground-truth instrumentation, energy/latency/footprint measurement on real hardware, on-device/TinyML profiling, estimation-theoretic baselines and bounds, and matching evidence to the shape of each sensing claim across the IP and SPOTS tracks.

1k repo stars
▌
Iros Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing IROS experiments — real-robot trial counts, success criteria set in advance, reset procedures, failure taxonomies, baseline fairness on matched hardware, sim-to-real gap reporting, small-n statistics, and the claim-to-evidence ladder that embodied-systems reviewers apply before they trust a demo.

1k repo stars
▌
Isca Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ISCA paper — pinning simulator fidelity to the claims it must carry, documenting gem5-class configurations and sampling choices, selecting workload suites that represent the claim's domain, tuning baselines in good faith, and separating architectural effect from modeling artifact.

1k repo stars
▌
Itcs Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what counts as evidence for an ITCS theory claim — proofs as the primary evidence, worked examples and separations that make a model concrete, and the rare, well-scoped illustrative computation or simulation — and how to keep any computational content checkable and subordinate to the mathematics.

1k repo stars
▌
Kdd Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when splitting a KDD paper across its 8 content pages, the optional appendix after the references, and the cited repository, under the camera-ready rule capping references plus appendix at 3 of 12 pages. Covers appendix triage, reviewer-discretion reality, and the one-page cross-cycle resubmission change summary.

1k repo stars
▌
Kdd Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising a KDD paper into the venue's register, where the first page names a data regime, a mechanism, and scale evidence, efficiency adjectives trace to design decisions, and two-column sigconf pages punish sprawl. Covers Research vs ADS voice, dataset-size discipline, assertive contribution bullets, and 8-page compression.

1k repo stars
▌
Lancet Writing · brycewang-stanford
Use to structure and hold the length of a Lancet Article main text — Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion (~3000–3500 words), the Research in context panel, a limited reference list (~30), and a cautious, globally minded Discussion that does not overstate.

1k repo stars
▌
Ndss Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NDSS paper — attack demonstrations, defense evaluations under adaptive adversaries, and Internet measurements — choosing between testbed, emulation, and live experiments and meeting NDSS's deployment-realism evidence bar.

1k repo stars
▌
Nsdi Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NSDI submission — choosing traces, testbeds, and deployment evidence, sizing scale and failure-injection experiments, picking baselines that fight back, and reporting tail behavior so networked-systems reviewers can see where the design wins, loses, and breaks.

1k repo stars
▌
Osdi Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an OSDI submission — choosing mature baselines and realistic workloads, structuring the section around research questions, measuring scalability and tail behavior, quantifying the design's costs, and fitting the evidence into the 12-page reviewed body.

1k repo stars
▌
Pldi Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.

1k repo stars
▌
Auto Review Loop LLM · brycewang-stanford
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".

1k repo stars
▌
Analyze Results · brycewang-stanford
Analyze ML experiment results, compute statistics, generate comparison tables and insights. Use when user says "analyze results", "compare", or needs to interpret experimental data.

1k repo stars
▌
Comm Lit Review Claude Single · brycewang-stanford
Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary. Search Zotero, Obsidian, and local paper folders first when available, then search IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and broader web in that order.

1k repo stars
▌
Experiment Plan · brycewang-stanford
Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after `research-refine`, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

1k repo stars
▌
Mermaid Diagram · brycewang-stanford
Generate Mermaid diagrams from user requirements. Saves .mmd and .md files to figures/ directory with syntax verification. Supports flowcharts, sequence diagrams, class diagrams, ER diagrams, Gantt charts, and 18 more diagram types.

1k repo stars
▌
Research Refine · brycewang-stanford
Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.

1k repo stars
▌
Research Review · brycewang-stanford
Get a deep critical review of research from GPT via Codex MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

1k repo stars
▌
Result To Claim · brycewang-stanford
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.

1k repo stars
▌
Brainstorm · brycewang-stanford
Use when starting a new research project, exploring a research idea, deciding whether a question is viable, or before touching code or data for a new paper. Runs a research-focused brainstorm that clarifies research question, identification strategy, data feasibility, and contribution before any implementation.

1k repo stars
▌
Write Plan · brycewang-stanford
Use when a research design spec exists and the user is ready to translate it into a concrete implementation plan with phased tasks, artifacts, and verification criteria. Produces a research execution plan organized in canonical research phases — collection, preparation, analysis, robustness, writing, submission.

1k repo stars
▌
Stata Modernize · brycewang-stanford bundle
Improve, modernize, and optimize existing Stata code for performance, portability, and maintainability. Use when legacy patterns such as preserve/restore, cd,

1k repo stars
▌
Agent Browser · brycewang-stanford bundle
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

1k repo stars
▌
Iv Estimation · brycewang-stanford bundle
Econometrics skill for instrumental variables and treatment effect estimation. Activates when the user asks about: "instrumental variables", "IV estimation", "2SLS", "two-stage least squares", "endogeneity", "weak instruments", "first stage", "Sargan test", "overidentification", "propensity score matching", "PSM", "average treatment effect", "ATT", "LATE", "local average treatment effect", "endogenous regressor", "instrument validity", "工具变量", "两阶段最小二乘", "内生性", "弱工具变量", "倾向得分匹配", "平均处理效应", "处理效应", "局部平均处理效应"

1k repo stars
▌
Skill Creator · brycewang-stanford bundle
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

1k repo stars
▌
Paper Slide Deck · brycewang-stanford bundle
Generate professional slide deck images from academic papers and content. Creates comprehensive outlines with style instructions, auto-detects figures from PDFs, then generates individual slide images. Use when user asks to "create slides", "make a presentation", "generate deck", or "slide deck" for papers.

1k repo stars
▌
Event Study · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use this skill whenever the user wants to conduct an event study, create event study plots, test for parallel trends, implement difference-in-differences designs, or work with any panel data estimation that involves pre/post treatment comparisons. Trigger on phrases like "event study", "parallel trends", "pre-trends", "dynamic treatment effects", "leads and lags", "TWFE", "two-way fixed effects", "staggered adoption", "staggered treatment", "difference-in-differences", "DiD", "Sun and Abraham", "Callaway and Sant'Anna", "de Chaisemartin", "Borusyak", "did_multiplegt", "fixest", "did2s", "bacon decomposition", or any reference to plotting coefficients around a treatment event. Also trigger when the user uploads panel data and wants to estimate treatment effects with variation in treatment timing. All code is in R.

1k repo stars
▌
Ablation Planner · brycewang-stanford
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. Codex designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective, CC reviews feasibility and implements.

1k repo stars
▌
Auto Review Loop · brycewang-stanford
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews via Codex MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

1k repo stars
▌
Semantic Scholar · brycewang-stanford
Search published venue papers (IEEE, ACM, Springer, etc.) via Semantic Scholar API. Complements /arxiv (preprints) with citation counts, venue metadata, and TLDR. Use when user says "search semantic scholar", "find IEEE papers", "find journal papers", "venue papers", "citation search", or wants published literature beyond arXiv preprints.

1k repo stars
▌
R Oop · brycewang-stanford
R object-oriented programming guide for S7, S3, S4, and vctrs. Use when designing R classes or choosing an OOP system.

1k repo stars
▌
Econ Write · brycewang-stanford bundle
Expert economics paper writing assistant synthesizing advice from 50+ top guides by Cochrane, McCloskey, Shapiro, Head, Bellemare, Goldin, Glaeser, Kremer, and other leading economists. USE THIS SKILL whenever the user writes, edits, reviews, rewrites, or structures any economics paper, thesis, job market paper, abstract, introduction, conclusion, results section, literature review, or referee response. Also handles LaTeX formatting, presentations, and paper audits. Covers all paper types (applied, theory, structural, mixed) and all sections.

1k repo stars
▌
Cost Benefit · brycewang-stanford bundle
Cost-benefit analysis. Produces economic NPV and financial NPV side by side, with BCR, optimism bias (with mitigation), Marginal Excess Tax Burden, real-terms rebasing, WELLBY / QALY / VPF wellbeing valuation, sensitivity, switching values, EANC for unequal-life options, validation gate, and a one-line headline verdict (socially worthwhile vs financially self-sustaining). Backed by the greenbook R package (HM Treasury Green Book primitives) when available, with graceful fallback. Supports HMT Green Book, EU Better Regulation, World Bank, ADB, and Victorian HVHR. Reads a longlist markdown file directly via --from.

1k repo stars
▌
Eda · brycewang-stanford bundle
Comprehensive exploratory data analysis with publication-quality descriptive tables, correlation matrices, distribution plots, and assumption testing. Generates a standalone EDA report with Table 1 (gtsummary/great_tables), correlation heatmap, distribution diagnostics, VIF for multicollinearity, and normality/homoscedasticity tests. All figures are APA-formatted and colorblind-safe. Use when the user says "exploratory analysis," "EDA," "descriptive statistics," "explore the data," "Table 1," "correlations," "distributions," or when /data-clean completes successfully. Triggers on "EDA," "descriptive," "Table 1," "explore," "correlations."

1k repo stars
▌
Dowhy · brycewang-stanford
Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"

1k repo stars
▌
China Cf Study · brycewang-stanford bundle
根据研究者提供的**研究计划书（Research Proposal）**执行基于中国制度环境的公司金融类实证研究全流程。**启动后第一件事：根据计划书的主题、识别策略、贡献边际与样本范围，从中国-context 英文顶级期刊池（JF/JFE/RFS/JFQA/MS/JCF/JBF/JAR/JAE/TAR/CAR/JIBS/China Economic Review/PBFJ 等 25+ 期刊）中推荐 5 本最匹配的目标期刊（[J1]–[J5]），等待研究者明确选定一本；该期刊决定 main.tex 的 bibliographystyle、Section 骨架、Introduction 风格与表注规范**。然后用 Python 完成数据清洗、描述性统计、基准回归、内生性检验（IV/2SLS、DML）、平行趋势、异质性、机制、稳健性检验与图表绘制。LaTeX 表格和图像严格遵循 template/ 示例格式，研究逻辑与排版严格遵循 rule/ 下的《通用实证研究逻辑与规范总结》与《回归表写作规范总结》。数据集与政策集从 asset/ 中按计划书中的关键词检索。**当计划书预期的实证结果无法实现时（系数不显著、平行趋势不通过、IV 弱工具、机制不成立等），skill 自动切换备选方案直至完成研究项目**。最终交付物：Python 代码 + LaTeX 表格 + 图像（.pdf/.png）。触发条件：研究者提交研究计划书（含 X→Y 假设、识别策略、样本、政策冲击等）。

1k repo stars
▌
Journal Digest · brycewang-stanford bundle
经济金融顶刊文献速递与选题建议生成器。通过RSS和网页抓取获取经济学、金融学、会计学顶级期刊的最新论文，筛选公司金融相关文献，生成中文综述摘要和研究选题建议。当用户提到"期刊速递"、"文献周报"、"论文速递"、"最新文献"、"journal digest"、"paper digest"、 "选题建议"、"研究选题"、"顶刊追踪"、"文献追踪"、"周报"时触发此技能。即使用户只是说"帮我看看最近有什么新论文"或"最近顶刊发了什么"，也应该触发。

1k repo stars
▌
Ols Regression · brycewang-stanford bundle
Econometrics skill for OLS regression and linear models. Activates when the user asks about: "run OLS", "linear regression", "ordinary least squares", "interpret regression results", "heteroskedasticity", "multicollinearity", "regression assumptions", "robust standard errors", "GLS", "WLS", "fit a regression model", "check regression diagnostics", "OLS假设", "最小二乘法", "线性回归", "回归系数", "残差检验", "异方差", "多重共线性", "普通最小二乘", "稳健标准误", "回归诊断"

1k repo stars
▌
Paper Pipeline · brycewang-stanford
Orchestrate the complete post-first-draft polishing pipeline for an academic LaTeX paper by invoking five existing skills in fixed order: (1) paper-polish, (2) paper-self-revise, (3) paper-style, (4) paper-polish again, (5) reference-verify. Trigger when user says "paper pipeline" / "paper-pipeline" / "论文流水线" / "全流程打磨" / "一条龙打磨" / "初稿打磨" / "full polish pipeline" / "run the whole pipeline", or wants the entire post-draft polishing sequence run on a paper folder. Use this skill whenever the user asks for several paper-finishing steps (polish + revise + style + reference check) on one manuscript in one go, even if they don't name every individual skill.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 50 of 53